Abstract:Introduction: Previous conflicts have demonstrated the impact of physician readiness on early battlefield mortality rates. To prepare for the lethal nature of today's threat environment and the rapid speed with which conflict develops, our medical force needs to sustain a high level of readiness in order to be ready to "fight tonight." Previous approaches that have relied on on-the-job training, just-in-time predeployment training, or follow-on courses after residency are unlikely to satisfy these readiness requirements. Sustaining the successes in battlefield care achieved in Iraq and Afghanistan requires the introduction of effective combat casualty care earlier and more often in physician training. This needs assessment seeks to better understand the requirements, challenges, and opportunities to include the Military Unique Curriculum (MUC) during graduate medical education. Materials and methods: This needs assessment used a multifaceted methodology. First, a literature review was performed to assess how Military Unique Curricula have evolved since their initial conception in 1988. Next, to determine their current state, a needs-based assessment survey was designed for trainees and program directors (PDs), each consisting of 18 questions with a mixture of multiple choice, ranking, Likert scale, and free-text questions. Cognitive interviewing and expert review were employed to refine the survey before distribution. The Housestaff Survey was administered using an online format and deployed to Internal Medicine trainees at the Walter Reed National Military Medical Center (WRNMMC). The Program Director Survey was sent to all Army and Navy Internal Medicine Program Directors. This project was deemed to not meet the definition of research in accordance with 32 Code of Federal Regulation 219.102 and Department of Defense Instruction 3216.02 and was therefore registered with the WRNMMC Quality Management Division. Results: Out of 64 Walter Reed Internal Medicine trainees who received the survey, 32 responses were received. Seven of nine PDs completed their survey. Only 12.5% of trainees felt significantly confident that they would be adequately prepared for a combat deployment upon graduation from residency with the current curriculum. Similarly, only 14.29% of PDs felt that no additional training was needed. A majority of trainees were not satisfied with the amount of training being received on any MUC topic. When incorporating additional training on MUC topics, respondents largely agreed that simulation and small group exercises were the most effective modalities to employ, with greater than 50% of both trainees and PDs rating these as most or second most preferred among seven options. Additionally, there was a consensus that training should be integrated into the existing curriculum/rotations as much as possible. Conclusions: Current Military Unique Curricula do not meet the expected requirements of future battlefields. Several solutions to incorporate more robust military unique training without creating any significant additional time burdens for trainees do exist. Despite the limitation of these results being limited to a single institution, this needs assessment provides a starting point for improvement to help ensure that we limit the impact of any "peacetime effect."

Examining the Perception of Military Culture in the Undergraduate University Classroom

Promoting Military Cultural Competence among Civilian Care Providers: Learning through Program Development

Educating medical students about military health: Perspectives from a multidisciplinary lecture initiative

Knowledge, Attitudes, Confidence, and comfort of Nurses and Nursing Students Caring for Military Veterans and Their Families

Counseling and Connecting with the Military Undergraduate: The Intersection of Military Service and University Life

The Military Health History: An Educational Initiative to Improve Veteran Healthcare

A qualitative assessment of perceptions of gender-based stigma among US Marine Corps officers in training

Examining Undergraduate Students’ Intercultural Competence in a Teaching Methods Course

Stereotyping of student service members and Veterans on a university campus in the U.S.

Applying Political Knowledge in Modern Combat: How the U.S. Military Can Use Social Science to Achieve Cross-Cultural Competency

Augmented Reality in Education

Updating the Military Unique Curriculum for a Ready Medical Force

School psychology graduate students' perspectives on multicultural training and program environment

Combatant socialization and norms of restraint: Examining officer training at the US Military Academy and Army ROTC

Creating a Culture of Character Growth: Developing Faculty Character and Competence at the United States Military Academy

Investigating the Educational Challenges Related to Cultural Competence Faced by Iraqi Nursing College Students

Civilian and Military Medical School Graduates' Readiness for Deployment: Areas of Strength and Opportunities for Growth

Emerging Adults in the Military and College: An Examination of Group Differences in Identity Development, Transdiagnostic Processes, and Attitudes Toward Risk and Suicide

Cultural Awareness and Sensitivity of Students in a Physical Therapy Program – A Pilot Survey

Emerging Trends in the Prevalence of Military Medicine Interest Groups and Specialty Tracks at U.S. Medical Schools

A critical analysis of undergraduate students' cultural immersion experiences