Interrogational Neuroimaging in Counterterrorism: A “No-Brainer” or a Human Rights Hazard?

J. Marks
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0098858800011400
IF: 0.694
2007-06-01
American Journal of Law & Medicine
Abstract:We neither invented lie detection technology nor can do much about the need for it, we have just devised a more reliable version…. Of course, if the public and its representatives believe that there is a threshold beyond which this technology should not progress, I am ready to stop and focus my energy in other directions. I can understand the ethical revulsion against a 'truth-telling machine.’… Every technology can bring good or bad results, depending on who uses it…. It's the scientist's job to try to push the envelope, and it is the job of… the public and its representatives to help gauge when we are approaching a danger zone…. As a researcher, more than anything, I for one need some guidance. —Ruben C. Gur, Director of the Brain Behavior Center at the University of Pennsylvania (on fMRI lie-detection)
What problem does this paper attempt to address?