MedTech innovation identification: A rapid scoping review of patent research studies to inform horizon scanning methods.
Sonia Garcia Gonzalez-Moral,Erin Pennock,Olushola Ewedairo,Elizabeth Green,James Elgey,Andrew Mkwashi
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.12.09.24318714
2024-12-10
Abstract:Objectives:
This study investigates the role of and methods for patent analysis in advancing medical
technology (MedTech) innovation, a sector characterized by diverse, non-pharmacological or
non-immunological healthcare technologies and significant research investment. Patents are
critical early indicators of innovation, supporting horizon scanning and weak signal detection.
The study aimed to identify intellectual property sources, evaluate methods for patent retrieval
and analysis, and outline objectives for using patent data to anticipate trends and inform
healthcare strategies. It also offered a methodological framework to support stakeholders in
adopting innovative MedTech solutions.
Methods:
A rapid review (RR) was conducted using Cochrane Rapid Review Methods and PRISMA
guidelines, with a pre-registered protocol on the Open Science Framework. Searches in
Embase, IEEE Xplore, and Web of Science targeted records from 2020 onwards. Three
independent reviewers screened studies using Rayyan. We included any study type,
published since 2020 that provided sufficient data on patent sources, methods and tools
applied to the study of MedTech. Our data extraction included bibliographic details, study
characteristics, and methodological information. Risk of bias assessments were not
undertaken. Narrative and tabular methods, supplemented by visual charts, were employed
to synthesise findings.
Results:
Our searches identified 1,741 studies, of which 124 were included after title, abstract, and full-text
screening, with 54% being original research, 44% reviews, and the remainder being
conference abstracts. Most studies (68%) relied solely on patent databases, while others
searched the grey literature. Research objectives of the included studies were grouped into
nine themes, with trend analysis (50%) and policy recommendations (20%) being the most
common. The review analysed 199 patent databases, with 27% of studies using multiple
sources. Time horizons for patent searches averaged 24.6 years, ranging from 1900 to 2019.
Automated approaches, employed in 33% of studies, frequently utilised tools like Gephi for
network visualization. Disease mapping, based on NICE classification, indicated that cancer
(19%) and respiratory conditions (16%), particularly COVID-19, were key areas, while digital
health dominated the "health and social care delivery" category.
Conclusions:
The review highlights the value of patent data in trend analysis and its broader role in shaping
policies and research strategies. While patents provide crucial insights into emerging
technologies, inconsistent de-duplication practices across studies pose a risk of data inflation,
accentuating the need for transparency and rigour. Finally, this review emphasized the
importance of data transformation and visualization in detecting emerging trends with Python
and R being the most commonly used programming languages for developing custom tools.