Abstract:Objective: To synthesise the available evidence on the effects of interventions designed to improve the delivery of healthcare that reduces the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions of healthcare. Design: Systematic review and structured synthesis. Search sources: Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, PubMed, Web of Science and Embase from inception to 3 May 2023. Selection criteria: Randomised, quasi-randomised and non-randomised controlled trials, interrupted time series and controlled or uncontrolled before-after studies that assessed interventions primarily designed to improve the delivery of healthcare that reduces the GHG emissions of healthcare initiated by clinicians or healthcare services within any setting. Main outcome measures: Primary outcome was GHG emissions. Secondary outcomes were financial costs, effectiveness, harms, patient-relevant outcomes, engagement and acceptability. Data collection and analysis: Paired authors independently selected studies for inclusion, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias using a modified checklist for observational studies and the certainty of the evidence using Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development and Evaluation. Data could not be pooled because of clinical and methodological heterogeneity, so we synthesised results in a structured summary of intervention effects with vote counting based on direction of effect. Results: 21 observational studies were included. Interventions targeted delivery of anaesthesia (12 of 21), waste/recycling (5 of 21), unnecessary test requests (3 of 21) and energy (1 of 21). The primary intervention type was clinician education. Most (20 of 21) studies were judged at unclear or high risk of bias for at least one criterion. Most studies reported effect estimates favouring the intervention (GHG emissions 17 of 18, costs 13 of 15, effectiveness 18 of 20, harms 1 of 1 and staff acceptability 1 of 1 studies), but the evidence is very uncertain for all outcomes (downgraded predominantly for observational study design and risk of bias). No studies reported patient-relevant outcomes other than death or engagement with the intervention. Conclusions: Interventions designed to improve the delivery of healthcare that reduces GHG emissions may reduce GHG emissions and costs, reduce anaesthesia use, waste and unnecessary testing, be acceptable to staff and have little to no effect on energy use or unintended harms, but the evidence is very uncertain. Rigorous studies that measure GHG emissions using gold-standard life cycle assessment are needed as well as studies in more diverse areas of healthcare. It is also important that future interventions to reduce GHG emissions evaluate the effect on beneficial and harmful patient outcomes. Prospero registration number: CRD42022309428.

Plasminogen activator activity increases during reversal of hepatic fibrosis in murine schistosomiasis.

Environmental Sustainability in Respiratory Care: An Overview of the healthCARe-Based envirONmental Cost of Treatment (CARBON) Programme

Recent Progress on Carbon Footprint Assessment of Healthcare Services

The carbon footprint of critical care: a systematic review

#5120 CARBON FOOTPRINT OF IN-CENTER HEMODIALYSIS: RESULTS OF A FRENCH PILOT STUDY

Enhancement of human parainfluenza virus-induced cell fusion by pradimicin, a low molecular weight mannose-binding antibiotic

The carbon footprint of hospital diagnostic imaging in Australia

The Carbon Footprint of Peritoneal Dialysis in Australia

The carbon footprint of a Dutch academic hospital—using a hybrid assessment method to identify driving activities and departments

Vital role of clinicians in reducing the NHS carbon footprint through smarter procurement decisions

Reducing the Carbon Footprint of China’s Health Sector through Clinical Pathway Modification and Disease Management, Based on Dialysis Cases

The carbon footprint of the perioperative transurethral resection of bladder tumour pathway

Handling ‘carbon footprint’ in orthopaedics

Clinician and health service interventions to reduce the greenhouse gas emissions generated by healthcare: a systematic review

Assessing the Carbon Footprint of Telemedicine: A Systematic Review

Carbon footprint of healthcare systems: a systematic review of evidence and methods

The carbon footprint of health care delivery in Western Australia's public health system

Intensive care unit carbon footprint: A bibliometric and document content analysis

Estimating the Carbon Footprint of Healthcare in the Canton of Geneva and Reduction Scenarios for 2030 and 2040

Taking a bite out of Scotland's dental carbon emissions in the transition to a low carbon future

The carbon footprint of cataract surgery pathways in England: an observational study using administrative data