Abstract:BackgroundDiabetes–related lower limb amputations are associated with considerable morbidity and mortality and are usually preceded by foot ulceration. The available systematic reviews of aggregate data are compromised because the primary studies report both adjusted and unadjusted estimates. As adjusted meta-analyses of aggregate data can be challenging, the best way to standardise the analytical approach is to conduct a meta-analysis based on individual patient data (IPD).There are however many challenges and fundamental methodological omissions are common; protocols are rare and the assessment of the risk of bias arising from the conduct of individual studies is frequently not performed, largely because of the absence of widely agreed criteria for assessing the risk of bias in this type of review. In this protocol we propose key methodological approaches to underpin our IPD systematic review of prognostic factors of foot ulceration in diabetes.Review questions;1. What are the most highly prognostic factors for foot ulceration (i.e. symptoms, signs, diagnostic tests) in people with diabetes?2. Can the data from each study be adjusted for a consistent set of adjustment factors?3. Does the model accuracy change when patient populations are stratified according to demographic and/or clinical characteristics?MethodsMEDLINE and EMBASE databases from their inception until early 2012 were searched and the corresponding authors of all eligible primary studies invited to contribute their raw data. We developed relevant quality assurance items likely to identify occasions when study validity may have been compromised from several sources. A confidentiality agreement, arrangements for communication and reporting as well as ethical and governance considerations are explained.We have agreement from the corresponding authors of all studies which meet the eligibility criteria and they collectively possess data from more than 17000 patients. We propose, as a provisional analysis plan, to use a multi-level mixed model, using “study” as one of the levels. Such a model can also allow for the within-patient clustering that occurs if a patient contributes data from both feet, although to aid interpretation, we prefer to use patients rather than feet as the unit of analysis. We intend to only attempt this analysis if the results of the investigation of heterogeneity do not rule it out and the model diagnostics are acceptable.DiscussionThis review is central to the development of a global evidence-based strategy for the risk assessment of the foot in patients with diabetes, ensuring future recommendations are valid and can reliably inform international clinical guidelines.

The impact of a podiatric lead limb preservation team on disease outcomes and risk prediction in the diabetic lower extremity: a retrospective cohort study

Reducing major lower extremity amputations after the introduction of a multidisciplinary team in patient with diabetes foot ulcer

How Does Provider and Patient Awareness of High-Risk Status for Lower-Extremity Amputation Influence Foot-Care Practice?

Reduction of Lower Extremity Clinical Abnormalities in Patients with Non-Insulin-Dependent Diabetes Mellitus

Pre-hospital Delay in Patients with Diabetic Foot Problems: Influencing Factors and Subsequent Quality of Care.

Protocol for a systematic review and individual patient data meta-analysis of prognostic factors of foot ulceration in people with diabetes: the international research collaboration for the prediction of diabetic foot ulcerations (PODUS)

Factors influencing lower extremity amputation outcomes in people with active foot ulceration in regional Australia: A retrospective cohort study

Effect of a preventive foot care program on lower extremity complications in diabetic patients with end-stage renal disease

The incidence of lower extremity amputation and its associated risk factors in patients with diabetic foot ulcers: A meta-analysis

Association of Demographic Characteristics and Laboratory Values in Diabetic Foot Infections Leading to Lower-Extremity Amputation

Predictive Factors of Amputation in Diabetic Foot

MANAGEMENT OF DIABETIC FOOT ULCERS AND RELATED COMPLICATIONS: A PROSPECTIVE OBSERVATIONAL STUDY

A prospective study of risk factors for diabetic foot ulcer. The Seattle Diabetic Foot Study.

Analysis of the interplay between proximal lower limb and foot joint structures as a mechanical predictor of neuropathic ulceration

Reducing Major Lower Extremity Amputations After the Introduction of a Multidisciplinary Team for the Diabetic Foot

Podiatrist intervention could reduce the incidence of foot ulcers in patients with diabetes: a hospital survey in China

Impact of microvascular complications on the outcomes of diabetic foot in type 2 diabetic patients with documented peripheral artery disease

Predictors of lower-extremity amputation in patients with an infected diabetic foot ulcer

Impact of multidisciplinary management via special clinic for the outcome of diabetic foot disease: A prospective observational study

Outcomes of minor amputations in patients with peripheral vascular disease over a 10-year period at a tertiary care institution

Implementation of routine foot check in patients with diabetes on hemodialysis: associations with outcomes