Early versus Delayed Timing of Primary Repair after Open-Globe Injury: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
David McMaster,James Bapty,Lana Bush,Giuseppe Serra,Theo Kempapidis,Scott F McClellan,Fasika A Woreta,Grant A Justin,Rupesh Agrawal,Annette K Hoskin,Kara Cavuoto,James Leong,Andrés Rousselot Ascarza,John Cason,Kyle E Miller,Matthew C Caldwell,William G Gensheimer,Tom H Williamson,Felipe Dhawahir-Scala,Peter Shah,Andrew Coombes,Gangadhara Sundar,Robert A Mazzoli,Malcolm Woodcock,Stephanie L Watson,Ferenc Kuhn,Marcus Colyer,Renata S M Gomes,Richard J Blanch
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2024.08.030
IF: 14.277
2024-08-31
Ophthalmology
Abstract:Topic: The timing of primary repair of open-globe injury is variable in major trauma centers worldwide, and consensus on optimal timing is lacking. Clinical relevance: Surgery is the mainstay of open-globe injury management, and appropriate timing of surgical repair may minimize the risk of potentially blinding complications such as endophthalmitis, thereby optimizing visual outcomes. Methods: A systematic literature review was performed following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines (International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews identifier, CRD42023442972). The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE, Embase, and ISRCTN registries and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched from inception through October 29, 2023. Prospective and retrospective nonrandomized studies of patients with open-globe injury with a minimum of 1 month of follow-up after primary repair were included. Primary outcomes included visual acuity at last follow-up and the proportion of patients with endophthalmitis. Certainty of the evidence was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations (GRADE) approach. Results: Fifteen studies met inclusion criteria, reporting a total of 8497 eyes. The most common injury types were penetrating and intraocular foreign body (IOFB). Meta-analysis found that primary repair less than 24 hours after open-globe injury was associated with 0.30 odds of endophthalmitis compared with primary repair conducted more than 24 hours after trauma (odds ratio, 0.39; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.19-0.79; I2 = 95%; P = 0.01). No significant difference was found in reported visual outcomes between patients whose open-globe injuries were repaired more than, compared with less than, 24 hours after trauma (odds ratio, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.61-1.29; I2 = 70%; P = 0.52). All included studies were retrospective and nonrandomized, demonstrating an overall low certainty of evidence on GRADE assessment. Discussion: Only retrospective data exist around the effect of timing of open-globe repair, resulting in low certainty of the available evidence. However, this review of current evidence, predominantly including penetrating and IOFB injuries, suggests that primary repair performed less than 24 hours after open-globe injury is associated with a reduced endophthalmitis rate compared with longer delays, consistent with delay to primary repair increasing endophthalmitis risk. Financial disclosure(s): Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.