Abstract:Given the remarkable capabilities of large language models (LLMs), there has been a growing interest in evaluating their similarity to the human brain. One approach towards quantifying this similarity is by measuring how well a model predicts neural signals, also called "brain score". Internal representations from LLMs achieve state-of-the-art brain scores, leading to speculation that they share computational principles with human language processing. This inference is only valid if the subset of neural activity predicted by LLMs reflects core elements of language processing. Here, we question this assumption by analyzing three neural datasets used in an impactful study on LLM-to-brain mappings, with a particular focus on an fMRI dataset where participants read short passages. We first find that when using shuffled train-test splits, as done in previous studies with these datasets, a trivial feature that encodes temporal autocorrelation not only outperforms LLMs but also accounts for the majority of neural variance that LLMs explain. We therefore use contiguous splits moving forward. Second, we explain the surprisingly high brain scores of untrained LLMs by showing they do not account for additional neural variance beyond two simple features: sentence length and sentence position. This undermines evidence used to claim that the transformer architecture biases computations to be more brain-like. Third, we find that brain scores of trained LLMs on this dataset can largely be explained by sentence length, position, and pronoun-dereferenced static word embeddings; a small, additional amount is explained by sense-specific embeddings and contextual representations of sentence structure. We conclude that over-reliance on brain scores can lead to over-interpretations of similarity between LLMs and brains, and emphasize the importance of deconstructing what LLMs are mapping to in neural signals.

Language in Brains, Minds, and Machines

Lost in Translation: The Algorithmic Gap Between LMs and the Brain

Divergences between Language Models and Human Brains

Dissociating language and thought in large language models: a cognitive perspective

Brain-Like Language Processing via a Shallow Untrained Multihead Attention Network

Large Language Models Demonstrate the Potential of Statistical Learning in Language

Large Language Models as Neurolinguistic Subjects: Identifying Internal Representations for Form and Meaning

Extending Machine Language Models toward Human-Level Language Understanding

A Sentence is Worth a Thousand Pictures: Can Large Language Models Understand Hum4n L4ngu4ge and the W0rld behind W0rds?

What Are Large Language Models Mapping to in the Brain? A Case Against Over-Reliance on Brain Scores

The Limitations of Large Language Models for Understanding Human Language and Cognition

Brain-like Functional Organization within Large Language Models

Evaluating Neural Language Models as Cognitive Models of Language Acquisition

What Artificial Neural Networks Can Tell Us About Human Language Acquisition

Placing language in an integrated understanding system: Next steps toward human-level performance in neural language models

Large Language Models and the Reverse Turing Test

Language models and psychological sciences

Brains and algorithms partially converge in natural language processing

Large Language Models: The Need for Nuance in Current Debates and a Pragmatic Perspective on Understanding

Structural Similarities Between Language Models and Neural Response Measurements

Contextual Feature Extraction Hierarchies Converge in Large Language Models and the Brain