Abstract:Background: We have previously shown that inferior outcomes at safety-net hospitals are largely dependent on hospital factors. We hypothesized that hospitals providing "high value" care (low cost and better outcomes) would have advantages in human and financial resources. Methods: The University HealthSystems Consortium Clinical Database and the American Hospital Association Annual Survey were used to examine hospitals performing eight complex surgical procedures from 2009 to 2013. Hospitals in the lowest quartiles of both mortality rate and cost were characterized as high value (n = 45), whereas those in the highest quartiles of both cost and mortality were low value (n = 45). Hospital size, staffing, and financial characteristics were compared between these two groups. Results: On average, high-value hospitals had lower proportions of Medicaid patient days (17% versus 30%; P < 0.01), higher proportions of outpatient surgery (63% versus 53%; P < 0.01), and spent more on capital expenditures per bed ($155,710 versus $62,434; P < 0.05). Also, high-value hospitals employed more hospitalists (0.08 versus 0.04 per bed; P < 0.01), had more privileged physicians (2.04 versus 1.25 per bed; P < 0.01), and had more full-time equivalent personnel (8.48 versus 6.79 per bed; all P < 0.05). As a result, these hospitals appeared to be more efficient; high-value hospitals had more total admissions per bed (46 versus 38; P < 0.01), fewer days per admission (5.20 versus 5.77; P < 0.01), and more inpatient surgeries per bed (15.7 versus 12.6; all P < 0.05). Conclusions: Hospitals that invest in more human resources and demonstrate increased throughput perform complex surgery at higher "value" (i.e., lower costs and mortality). Value-based purchasing initiatives that link hospital reimbursement to unadjusted surgical outcomes may exacerbate, rather than improve, disparities in surgical care that currently exist.

Achieving strategic cost advantages by focusing on back-office efficiency

Hospitals' strategies to reduce costs and improve quality: survey of hospital leaders

Healthcare information management and operational cost performance: empirical evidence

Can a hospital be like a supermarket? Better data will provide cost controls, efficiencies, and income streams

Extract BIG savings from physician preference items. Use a data-driven, team-based approach to drive down costs

Building a world-class A/P function: how UPMC went paperless

Better Inpatient Health Quality at Lower Cost: Should I Participate in the Online Healthcare Community First?

The Effect of a Multidisciplinary Hospitalist/Physician and Advanced Practice Nurse Collaboration on Hospital Costs

Digitalization of the Healthcare Supply Chain through the Adoption of Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) Systems in Hospitals: An Empirical Study on Influencing Factors and Cost Performance

How not to cut health care costs

A changing supply chain for a changing health care system: Barriers and facilitators of implementing enterprise resource planning

Is the System Really the Solution? Operating Costs in Hospital Systems

Improving operating room efficiency via an interprofessional approach

Advancing strategic procurement: Enhancing efficiency and cost management in high-stakes environments

Enhancing productivity with modular storage cabinets

Reducing technology costs and risks in a managed care environment

Best practice in unbilled account management: one medical center's story

The billing process: improving efficiency and effectiveness

Automated hospital pharmacy supply chain and the evaluation of organisational impacts and costs

Procurement in healthcare: Ensuring efficiency and compliance in medical supplies and equipment management

Hospital resources are associated with value-based surgical performance