Heterogenization of a Sandwich [(PW9O34)2Co4(H2O)2]10− in PCN–222/PCN–222(M): Exploring the Electron Transfer for Electrocatalytic CO2 Reduction

Lei Shu,Can Li,Meng-Ting Peng,Meng-Jie Liu,Yun-Lei Teng,Bao-xia Dong
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ejic.202400485
IF: 2.551
2024-11-01
European Journal of Inorganic Chemistry
Abstract:In this study, we designed and prepared polyoxometalate@metal‐organic framework (POM@MOF) composite catalysts through the anchoring of a sandwich POM [(PW9O34)2Co4(H2O)2]10− (shortened as P2W18Co4) to the hexagonal channel of the PCN–222 (metal‐free) or PCN–222(M) (M=Fe, Co) frameworks. The composite materials were applied to the electrocatalytic reduction of CO2 reaction (CO2RR) to analyse the effect of incorporating P2W18Co4 on catalytic activity. The P2W18Co4@PCN–222 composite exhibited enhanced activity across a wide potential range (–0.60~ –0.85 V vs. RHE) and an optimal FECO of 72% at –0.75 V vs. RHE, which was more than double that of PCN–222 (FECO= 33%). The current density surpassed that of the PCN–222 precursors by over sixteen times at the same potential. In contrast, the P2W18Co4@PCN–222(M) composite demonstrated decreased current density, minimal enhancement in CO2RR activity, and a competing HER behaviour. Density functional theory calculations were conducted on simplified models of P2W18Co4@H2–TCPP and P2W18Co4@M–TCPP to elucidate the divergent catalytic performances. The findings revealed that while both configurations exhibited the same rate‐limiting step (formation of the *COOH intermediate), a significantly reduced reaction barrier was only observed in the P2W18Co4@H2–TCPP setup, explaining its substantial activity improvement.
chemistry, inorganic & nuclear
What problem does this paper attempt to address?