Abstract:BackgroundUnderstanding sex and gender in health research can improve the quality of scholarship and enhance health outcomes. Funding agencies and academic journals are two key gatekeepers of knowledge production and dissemination, including whether and how sex/gender is incorporated into health research. Though attention has been paid to key issues and practices in accounting for sex/gender in health funding agencies and academic journals, to date, there has been no systematic analysis documenting whether and how agencies and journals require attention to sex/gender, what conceptual explanations and practical guidance are given for such inclusion, and whether existing practices reflect the reality that sex/gender cannot be separated from other axes of inequality.MethodsOur research systematically examines official statements about sex/gender inclusion from 45 national-level funding agencies that fund health research across 36 countries (covering the regions of the EU and associated countries, North America, and Australia) and from ten top-ranking general health (the top five in “science” and the top five in “social science”) and ten sex- and/or gender-related health journals. We explore the extent to which agencies and journals require inclusion of sex/gender considerations and to what extent existing strategies reflect state of the art understandings of sex/gender, including intersectional perspectives.ResultsThe research highlights the following: (a) there is no consistency in whether sex/gender are mentioned in funding and publishing guidelines; (b) there is wide variation in how sex/gender are conceptualized and how researchers are asked to address the inclusion/exclusion of sex/gender in research; (c) funding agencies tend to prioritize male/female equality in research teams and funding outcomes over considerations of sex/gender in research content and knowledge production; and (d) with very few exceptions, agency and journal criteria fail to recognize the complexity of sex/gender, including the intersection of sex/gender with other key factors that shape health.ConclusionsThe conceptualization and integration of sex/gender needs to better capture the interacting and complex factors that shape health—an imperative that can be informed by an intersectional approach. This can strengthen current efforts to advance scientific excellence in the production and reporting of research. We provide recommendations and supporting questions to strengthen consideration of sex/gender in policies and practices of health journals and funding agencies.

Review of the Influences of Sex Differences on Health and Disease: What Is the Role of Journals?

Sex difference in human diseases: mechanistic insights and clinical implications

Gender-based research underscores sex differences in biological processes, clinical disorders and pharmacological interventions

The impact of sex/gender-specific funding and editorial policies on biomedical research outcomes: a cross-national analysis (2000–2021)

Editorial: Improving How Orthopaedic Journals Report Research Outcomes Based on Sex and Gender

Influence of Sex and Gender on Musculoskeletal Conditions and How They Are Reported

Sex as a biological variable for cardiovascular physiology

Beyond sex and gender difference in funding and reporting of health research

Sex as a Biological Variable in Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine

Sex as a Biological Variable in Oral Diseases: Evidence and Future Prospects

Australian medical research that considered sex as a biological variable: a meta-analysis

Sex-Specific Variation in Metabolic Responses to Diet

Sex differences in metabolism and cardiometabolic disorders

Exploring sex differences: insights into gene expression, neuroanatomy, neurochemistry, cognition, and pathology

Consideration of sex as a biological variable in diabetes research across twenty years

The Integration of Sex and Gender Considerations Into Biomedical Research: Lessons From International Funding Agencies

Sex differences in blood pressure regulation and hypertension: renal, hemodynamic, and hormonal mechanisms

Sex as a Biological Variable in Emergency Medicine Research and Clinical Practice: A Brief Narrative Review

Revisiting sex as a biological variable in hypertension research

Considering sex as a biological variable will require a global shift in science culture

The Impact of a Lack of Reporting of Sex and Gender in Clinical Research on the Continuum of Medical Education