Abstract:Background: Periodontists have found the gingival autograft to be an effective and predictable technique to increase the amount of attached gingiva around teeth, but this technique requires the surgeon to harvest donor tissue from a remote surgical site. The present study seeks to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of a tissue-engineered skin equivalent, a living human fibroblast-derived dermal substitute (HF-DDS), compared to a gingival autograft (GA) consisting of donor tissue harvested from the patient's palate in a procedure designed to increase the amount of keratinized tissue around teeth that do not require root coverage. Methods: Twenty-five patients with insufficient attached gingiva associated with at least two teeth in contralateral quadrants of the same jaw were treated. One tooth in each patient was randomized to receive either a GA (control) or a HF-DDS graft (test). Clinical parameters measured at baseline and 3, 5, 7, 9, and 12 months included recession, clinical attachment level, keratinized tissue height, and plaque index. Probing depth was measured at 7, 9, and 12 months. Inflammation of each site was scored and texture and color of the grafted tissue were compared to the surrounding tissue. Resistance to muscle pull was evaluated and a questionnaire was used to determine patient preference. Surgical position of the graft and alveolar bone level were recorded at the surgical visit and patients were evaluated weekly for the first 4 weeks at which time recession and level of oral hygiene were measured. Biopsies and persistence studies were performed on a subset of the patients. Results: Results for both test and control groups were similar for all measured clinical parameters with the exception of amount of keratinized tissue and percent shrinkage of keratinized tissue. The control group exhibited an average of 1.0 to 1.2 mm more keratinized tissue over time than the test group (P <0.001) and the control group had about half as much shrinkage as the test group over time (P <0.001). Test sites demonstrated significantly better color match over time compared to control sites. Similarly, tissue texture for test sites was significantly better than control sites over time. Conclusions: Based on the results of this investigation, the tissue engineered HF-DDS graft was safe and capable of generating keratinized tissue without the morbidity and potential clinical difficulties associated with donor site surgery. The GA generated more keratinized tissue and shrank less than the HF-DDS graft, but the test graft generated tissue that appeared more natural.

Acellular dermal matrix seeded with autologous gingival fibroblasts for the treatment of gingival recession: a proof-of-concept study

Clinical efficacy of acellular dermal matrix for plastic periodontal and implant surgery: a systematic review

Effectiveness of acellular dermal matrix graft with a coronally advanced flap for the treatment of Miller Class I/II single gingival recession with thin gingival phenotype: study protocol for a split-mouth randomised controlled trial

Efficacy of Xenogeneic Collagen Matrix in the Treatment of Gingival Recessions: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Comparison of acellular dermal matrix allograft (ADMA) and a subepithelial connective tissue graft (SCTG) for the treatment of gingival recession

Subgingival acellular dermal matrix allograft for the treatment of gingival recession: a case report

Efficacy of collagen membrane seeded with autologous gingival fibroblasts in gingival recession treatment: a randomized, controlled pilot study

Marine Collagen Matrix Carrier with Injectable Platelet-Rich Fibrin in Management of Gingival Recession Defects

A 6-month comparative clinical study of a conventional and a new surgical approach for root coverage with acellular dermal matrix

Treatment of gingival recession using free gingival graft with fibrin fibronectin sealing system: A novel approach

Treatment of Localized Gingival Recession with an Enamel Matrix Protein-Coated Xenogeneic Dermal Matrix: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Gingival Unit Graft Versus Free Gingival Graft for Treatment of Gingival Recession: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial

Acellular dermal matrix allografts to achieve increased attached gingiva. Part 1. A clinical study

Clinical study of using acellular dermal matrix in the reconstruction of gingiva around dental implants

Periodontal biotype modification using a volume-stable collagen matrix and autogenous subepithelial connective tissue graft for the treatment of gingival recession: a case series

Evaluation of the safety and efficacy of periodontal applications of a living tissue-engineered human fibroblast-derived dermal substitute. I. Comparison to the gingival autograft: a randomized controlled pilot study

Micro‐needling versus acellular dermal matrix in RT1 gingival recession coverage: A randomized clinical trial

Comparison of the Clinical Efficacy of Bioresorbable Xenogeneic Peritoneal Membrane vs Connective Tissue Graft in the Management of Gingival Recession Defects: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial

The coronally advanced flap in combination with platelet-rich fibrin (PRF) and enamel matrix derivative in the treatment of gingival recession: a comparative study

Prevention of gingival recession following flap debridement surgery by subepithelial connective tissue graft: consecutive case series

Root surface modifiers and subepithelial connective tissue graft for treatment of gingival recessions: a systematic review