Abstract:Abstract Objectives Modified cortical bone trajectory (MCBT) technique was proposed by our team in previous studies, but its biomechanical properties at adjacent segments have not been discussed yet. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to investigate the biomechanical properties of modified cortical bone trajectory (MCBT) technique on adjacent segment degeneration (ASD) in transforaminal intradiscal lumbar disc fusion (TLIF) compare to traditional bone trajectory (TT) technique and cortical bone trajectory (CBT) technique. Methods The four human cadaveric lumbar specimens were provided by the anatomy teaching and research department of Xinjiang Medical University and four intact finite element models of the L1-S1 segment were generated. For each of these, three transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion procedures with three different fixation techniques were reconstructed at the L4-L5 segment, as follows: TT-TT (TT at both L4 and L5 segments), CBT-CBT (CBT at both L4 and L5 segments), MCBT-MCBT (MCBT at both L4 and L5 segments). The range of motion and von Mises stress of the intervertebral disc of the L3-L4 and L5-S1 segments were recorded with a 400N compressive load and 7.5 Nm moments in flexion, extension, left–right bending, and left–right rotation. Results The peak ROM of the L3-L4 segment in the MCBT-MCBT group was reduced by 10.5%, 6.1%, 12.2%, 4.1%, and 1.5% in flexion, extension, left–right bending, and left rotation compared to the TT-TT group and reduced by 1.8%, 5.5%, 10.0%, 12.8%, and 8.8% in flexion, left–right bending, and left–right rotation compared to the CBT-CBT group, respectively. The MCBT-MCBT group has the lowest peak ROM of the L3-L4 segment in flexion, left bending, and right rotation, the lowest peak ROM of the L5-S1 segment in extension and right rotation, and the lowest peak von Mises stress of the intervertebral disc at the L5-S1 segment in right rotation compared to the TT-TT and CBT-CBT group. In addition, the peak von Mises stress at the L3-L4 segment was lowest and more dispersed in all motions, the MCBT-MCBT group exhibited lower peak ROM of the L5-S1 segment in flexion, extension, and right rotation, and showed lower peak von Mises stress of the disc at the L5-S1 segment in flexion, extension, and right rotation compared with the TT-TT group. Conclusion The modified cortical bone trajectory technique may have a beneficial effect on reducing the incidence of ASD in the L4-L5 TLIF model compared to the traditional bone trajectory technique and cortical bone trajectory technique.

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The main problem that this paper attempts to solve is to evaluate the biomechanical influence of the Modified Cortical Bone Trajectory (MCBT) on adjacent segment degeneration (ASD) in transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF). Specifically, the study aims to compare the biomechanical characteristics of the adjacent segments after TLIF surgery among the MCBT technique, the traditional trajectory (TT) technique and the cortical bone trajectory (CBT) technique, especially regarding the range of motion (ROM) of the adjacent segments and the von Mises stress of the intervertebral disc. ### Research Background - **Adjacent Segment Degeneration (ASD)**: ASD is a pathological process that occurs in the adjacent spinal segments after lumbar fusion surgery and may lead to abnormalities. Research shows that factors such as age, fusion fixation, facet joint injury, number of fusion segments, gender, degree of osteoporosis, body mass index and surgical methods may accelerate the degeneration of adjacent segments. - **Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion (TLIF)**: First proposed by the German surgeon Harms in 1986, it is an intervertebral fusion technique based on posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF). TLIF can significantly reduce the risk of dural sac rupture and nerve injury and has been widely used in clinical practice. - **Traditional Trajectory (TT) Technique**: Currently the "gold standard" for spinal fixation techniques, but it has defects such as screw loosening after surgery, especially in elderly osteoporotic patients. - **Cortical Bone Trajectory (CBT) Technique**: Proposed by Santoni et al. in 2009, compared with the TT technique, the CBT technique has more contact with the cortical bone, which improves the pull - out strength and insertion torque of the screw. However, the CBT technique fails to fully utilize the cortical bone on the medial edge of the pedicle and the lateral edge of the upper endplate of the vertebral body. - **Modified Cortical Bone Trajectory (MCBT) Technique**: Proposed by the author's team since 2018, aiming to further improve the biomechanical performance of the screw through a longer cortical screw path and a screw placement position closer to the medial wall of the pedicle and the lateral edge of the upper endplate of the vertebral body. ### Research Purpose Through finite element analysis (FEA), evaluate the influence of the MCBT technique on adjacent segment degeneration in TLIF surgery and compare it with the TT technique and the CBT technique to explore whether the MCBT technique can reduce the incidence of ASD. ### Main Findings - **Range of Motion (ROM)**: - In the L3 - L4 segment, the peak ROM of the MCBT - MCBT group in flexion, extension, left and right lateral flexion and left rotation decreased by 10.5%, 6.1%, 12.2%, 4.1% and 1.5% respectively compared with the TT - TT group. - In the L3 - L4 segment, the peak ROM of the MCBT - MCBT group in flexion, left and right lateral flexion and left and right rotation decreased by 1.8%, 5.5%, 10.0%, 12.8% and 8.8% respectively compared with the CBT - CBT group. - In the L5 - S1 segment, the peak ROM of the MCBT - MCBT group in flexion, extension and right rotation decreased by 2.5%, 15.8% and 7% respectively compared with the TT - TT group. - **von Mises Stress**: - In the L3 - L4 segment, the peak von Mises stress of the MCBT - MCBT group in right rotation decreased by 1.4% compared with the TT - TT group. - In the L5 - S1 segment, the peak von Mises stress of the MCBT - MCBT group in flexion, extension, right flexion and right rotation decreased by 0.39%, 0.75%, 3.33% and 0.78% respectively compared with the TT - TT group. ### Conclusion The modified cortical bone trajectory technique (MCBT) may be more effective in reducing the incidence of adjacent segment degeneration (ASD) than the traditional bone trajectory technique and the cortical bone trajectory technique in the L4 - L5 TLIF model. This is mainly because the MCBT technique performs better in the biomechanical characteristics of the adjacent segments, especially in reducing the adjacent segments.

Biomechanical evaluation of modified and traditional cortical bone trajectory technique on adjacent segment degeneration in transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion—finite element analysis

Topping-off surgery vs posterior lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative lumbar disease: a finite element analysis

Biomechanical investigation of the hybrid lumbar fixation technique with traditional and cortical bone trajectories in transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: finite element analysis

Biomechanical Assessment of Different Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Constructs in Normal and Osteoporotic Condition-A Finite Element Analysis

Biomechanical Comparison of Laminectomy, Hemilaminectomy and A New Minimally Invasive Approach in the Surgical Treatment of Multilevel Cervical Intradural Tumour: A Finite Element Analysis

Biomechanical Evaluation of Different Surgical Procedures in Single-Level Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion in Vitro

[Effects of cortical bone trajectory screw in adjacent-segment disease after posterior lumbar interbody fusion]

[Effect of posterior lumbar fusion on the degeneration of adjacent segments using cortical bone trajectory screw fixation]

Application of dual-trajectory screws in revision surgery for lumbar adjacent segment disease: a finite element study

A Biomechanical Stability Study of Extraforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion on the Cadaveric Lumbar Spine Specimens

Biomechanical assessment of lumbar stability: finite element analysis of TLIF with a novel combination of coflex and pedicle screws

Effects of different lumbar fusion modes on lumbar spine biomechanics

Biomechanical Changes of Degenerated Adjacent Segment and Intact Lumbar Spine after Lumbosacral Topping-off Surgery: A Three-dimensional Finite Element Analysis

Cortical Trajectory versus Traditional Pedicle Screw Trajectory in Open Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Meta-Analysis of Complications and Clinical Outcomes

Oblique lateral interbody fusion with internal fixations in the treatment for cross-segment degenerative lumbar spine disease (L2-3 and L4-5) finite element analysis

Biomechanical Analysis of Adjacent Segments after Spinal Fusion Surgery Using a Geometrically Parametric Patient-Specific Finite Element Model

Biomechanical effect of proximal multifidus injury on adjacent segments during posterior lumbar interbody fusion: a finite element study

The Anterior and Traverse Cage Can Provide Optimal Biomechanical Performance for Both Traditional and Percutaneous Endoscopic Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion

Finite Element Analysis of a Novel Fusion Strategy in Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion

Biomechanical evaluation of strategies for adjacent segment disease after lateral lumbar interbody fusion: is the extension of pedicle screws necessary?

Biomechanical Evaluation of Two Fusion Techniques Based on Finite Element Analysis: Percutaneous Endoscopic and Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion