Abstract:Visually induced motion sickness (VIMS), characterized by symptoms such as dizziness, nausea, and postural instability, presents significant challenges in modern visual and interactive technologies. These symptoms undermine the immersion into and comfort of virtual and augmented reality (VR/AR) systems and reduce the usability of autonomous vehicles, highlighting the urgent need to address VIMS for broader adoption of these technologies. While previous studies have largely focused on the motion characteristics that induce VIMS, the impact of visual field configuration, such as segmentation and occlusion, has been largely unexplored. To bridge this gap, we conducted five human psychophysics experiments systematically investigating how visual field segmentation and masking influence VIMS under controlled three-dimensional optical flow conditions. Participants were exposed to different masking patterns, including variations in the number of divided sections, the masking of the central screen region, and the thickness of the masks. Paired-comparison methods were employed to assess participants’ susceptibility to VIMS under each condition. Our findings showed that visual field segmentation significantly influenced VIMS susceptibility. Specifically, the results revealed three key findings: (1) segmenting the visual field into multiple subsections using visual masks significantly increased VIMS susceptibility, (2) thinner masks exacerbated motion sickness more than thicker ones, and (3) masking the central region of the screen reduced susceptibility. These effects were independent of the presented motion patterns. Our findings offer new insights for optimizing the design of VR/AR systems, graphical user interfaces, and autonomous vehicles by highlighting the importance of visual field configuration in mitigating VIMS for improving user experience.

The Effect of Visual Field Occlusion on Visually Induced Motion Sickness

Effects of within-day intervals on adaptation to visually induced motion sickness in a virtual-reality motorcycling simulator

Assessment of Visually Induced Motion Sickness in Immersive Videos.

Real-Time Viewport-Aware Optical Flow Estimation in 360-degree Videos for Visually-Induced Motion Sickness Mitigation

Mismatches between 3D Content Acquisition and Perception Cause More Visually Induced Motion Sickness

Factors affecting vection and motion sickness in a passive virtual reality driving simulation

Mixing in Reverse Optical Flow to Mitigate Vection and Simulation Sickness in Virtual Reality

Reducing Motion Sickness When Reading With Head-Mounted Displays By Using See-Through Background Images

Towards 360 VR Sickness Mitigation: From Virtual Reality Eye-tracking to Visual Communication

Emotions are associated with the genesis of visually induced motion sickness in virtual reality

Generating Visual Information for Motion Sickness Reduction Using a Computational Model Based on SVC Theory

Analysis on Mitigation of Visually Induced Motion Sickness by Applying Dynamical Blurring on a User's Retina

Beyond Feeling Sick: The Visual and Cognitive Aftereffects of Virtual Reality

Analysis of Visual and Vestibular Information on Motion Sickness in Flight Simulation

A Study on the Effects of Head Mounted Displays Movement and Image Movement on Virtual Reality Sickness.

Evaluation of Adaptation to Visually Induced Motion Sickness by Using Physiological Index Associated with Baroreflex Function

Spatial and temporal EEG dynamics of motion sickness

Subjective Vertical Conflict Model With Visual Vertical: Predicting Motion Sickness on Autonomous Personal Mobility Vehicles

Investigating the Relative Contributions of Unexpected Vection and Postural Instability to VR Cybersickness

Relationship Between Feeling of Presence and Visually Induced Motion Sickness While Viewing Stereoscopic Movies

Motion sickness resistant people showed suppressed steady-state visually evoked potential (SSVEP) under vection-inducing stimulation