Neural Mechanisms of tDCS: Insights from an In-Vivo Rodent Model with Realistic Electric Field Strengths
Liyi Chen,Alireza Majdi,Boateng Asamoah,Myles Mc Laughlin
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.12.20.629687
2024-12-21
Abstract:Introduction:Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a non-invasive neuromodulation method using low amplitude current (1–2 mA) to create weak electric fields (<1 V/m) in the brain, influencing cognition, motor skills, and behavior. However, the neural mechanisms remain unclear, as prior studies used high electric field strengths (10–40 V/m) unrepresentative of human tDCS.
Objective:This study aimed to develop an in-vivo rat model replicating human tDCS electric field strengths to examine effects of weak electric fields on cortical neurons.
Method:Currents of 0.005–0.3 mA were applied in 9 rats, generating electric fields of 0.5–35 V/m in the somatosensory cortex. Neural activity across cortical layers was recorded using a multichannel silicone probe. Somatosensory evoked potentials (SSEP) elicited by foot shocks assessed membrane polarization. Regular spiking (RS) and fast-spiking (FS) neurons were identified via spike shapes. Effects of tDCS on SSEP, spontaneous spiking activity (SSA), and evoked spiking activity (ESA) were analyzed.
Results:Anodal tDCS caused hyperpolarization (SSEP increase) in superficial layers and depolarization (SSEP decrease) in deeper layers, reversing asymmetrically for cathodal stimulation. Weak fields (<1 V/m) altered SSA in RS but not FS neurons, while stronger fields affected ESA in RS neurons. Effects correlated with field strength and were well described by linear mixed-effect models. Changes in SSA were correlated with changes in SSEP.
Conclusion:This study demonstrates that realistic tDCS fields induce complex cortical polarization patterns linked to SSA changes. Increasing electric field strength amplifies effects, suggesting higher amplitude tDCS could enhance efficacy in humans.
Neuroscience
What problem does this paper attempt to address?