Diazepam modulates hippocampal CA1 functional connectivity in people at clinical high-risk for psychosis

Nicholas R. Livingston,Amanda Kiemes,Owen O'Daly,Samuel R Knight,Paulina Lukow,Luke A. Jelen,Thomas J. Reilly,Aikaterini Dima,Maria A. Nettis,Cecilia Casetta,Gabriel A. Devenyi,Thomas Spencer,Andrea De Micheli,Paolo Fusar Poli,Anthony A. Grace,Steve C.R. Williams,Philip McGuire,M. Mallar Chakravarty,Alice Egerton,Gemma Modinos
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.12.20.24319330
2024-12-21
Abstract:Background: Preclinical evidence suggests that diazepam enhances hippocampal γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA) signalling and normalises a psychosis-relevant cortico-limbic-striatal circuit. Hippocampal network dysconnectivity, particularly from the CA1 subfield, is evident in people at clinical high-risk for psychosis (CHR-P), representing a potential treatment target. This study aimed to forward-translate this preclinical evidence. Methods: In this randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study, 18 CHR-P individuals underwent resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging twice, once following a 5mg dose of diazepam and once following a placebo. They were compared to 20 healthy controls (HC) who did not receive diazepam/placebo. Functional connectivity (FC) between the hippocampal CA1 subfield and the nucleus accumbens (NAc), amygdala, and ventromedial prefrontal cortex (vmPFC) was calculated. Mixed-effects models investigated the effect of group (CHR-P placebo/diazepam vs. HC) and condition (CHR-P diazepam vs. placebo) on CA1-to-region FC. Results: In the placebo condition, CHR-P individuals showed significantly lower CA1-vmPFC (Z=3.17, PFWE=0.002) and CA1-NAc (Z=2.94, PFWE=0.005) FC compared to HC. In the diazepam compared to placebo condition, CA1-vmPFC FC was significantly increased (Z=4.13, PFWE=0.008) in CHR-P individuals, and both CA1-vmPFC and CA1-NAc FC were normalised to HC levels. In contrast, compared to HC, CA1-amygdala FC was significantly lower contralaterally and higher ipsilaterally in CHR-P individuals in both the placebo and diazepam conditions (lower: placebo Z=3.46, PFWE=0.002, diazepam Z=3.33, PFWE=0.003; higher: placebo Z=4.48, PFWE<0.001, diazepam Z=4.22, PFWE<0.001). Conclusions: This study demonstrates that diazepam can partially restore hippocampal CA1 dysconnectivity in CHR-P individuals, suggesting that modulation of GABAergic function might be useful in the treatment of this clinical group.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?