LRRK2-Associated Parkinsonism With and Without In Vivo Evidence of Alpha-Synuclein Aggregates
Lana Chahine,David-Erick Lafontant,Seung Ho Choi,Hirotaka Iwaki,Cornelis Blauwendraat,Andrew Singleton,Michael Brumm,Roy Alcalay,Kalpana Merchant,Kelly Nicole Holohan Nudelman,Alain Dagher,Andrew Vo,Qin Tao,Charles S Venuto,Karl Kieburtz,Kathleen Poston,Susan Bressman,Paulina Gonzalez-Latapi,Brian Avants,Christopher Coffey,Danna Jennings,Eduardo Tolosa,Andrew Siderowf,Kenneth Marek,Tanya Simuni
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.07.22.24310806
2024-07-22
Abstract:Background: Among LRRK2-associated parkinsonism cases with nigral degeneration, over two-thirds demonstrate evidence of pathologic alpha-synuclein, but many do not. Understanding the clinical phenotype and underlying biology in such individuals is critical for therapeutic development. Our objective was to compare clinical and biomarker features, and rate of progression over 4 years follow-up, among LRRK2-associated parkinsonism cases with and without in vivo evidence of alpha-synuclein aggregates.
Methods: Data were from the Parkinson's Progression Markers Initiative, a multicenter prospective cohort study. The sample included individuals diagnosed with Parkinson disease with pathogenic variants in LRRK2. Presence of CSF alpha-synuclein aggregation was assessed with seed amplification assay. A range of clinician- and patient- reported outcome assessments were administered. Biomarkers included dopamine transporter SPECT scan, CSF amyloid-beta1-42, total tau, phospho-tau181, urine bis(monoacylglycerol)phosphate levels, and serum neurofilament light chain. Linear mixed effects models examined differences in trajectory in CSF negative and positive groups.
Results: 148 LRRK2-parkinsonism cases (86% with G2019S variant), 46 negative and 102 positive for CSF alpha-synuclein seed amplification assay were included. At baseline, the negative group were older than the positive group (median [interquartile range] 69.1 [65.2-72.3] vs 61.5 [55.6-66.9] years, p<0.001) and a greater proportion were female (28 (61%) vs 43 (42%), p=0.035). Despite being older, the negative group had similar duration since diagnosis, and similar motor rating scale (16 [11-23] vs 16 [10-22], p=0.480) though lower levodopa equivalents. Only 13 (29%) of the negative group were hyposmic, compared to 75 (77%) of the positive group. Lowest putamen dopamine transporter binding expected for age and sex was greater in the negative vs positive groups (0.36 [0.29-0.45] vs 0.26 [0.22-0.37], p<0.001). Serum neurofilament light chain was higher in the negative group compared to the positive group (17.10 [13.60-22.10] vs 10.50 [8.43-14.70]; age-adjusted p-value=0.013). In terms of longitudinal change, the negative group remained stable in functional rating scale score in contrast to the positive group who had a significant increase (worsening) of 0.729 per year (p=0.037), but no other differences in trajectory were found.
Conclusion: Among individuals diagnosed with Parkinson disease with pathogenic variants in the LRRK2 gene, we found clinical and biomarker differences in cases without versus with in vivo evidence of CSF alpha-synuclein aggregates. LRRK2 parkinsonism cases without evidence of alpha-synuclein aggregates as a group exhibit less severe motor manifestations and decline may have more significant cognitive dysfunction. The underlying biology in LRRK2-parkinsonism cases without evidence of alpha-synuclein aggregates requires further investigation.
Key words: Parkinsonism, LRRK2, alpha-synuclein