Abstract:Background: The availability of increasingly powerful large language models (LLMs) has attracted substantial interest in their potential for interpreting and generating human-like text for biomedical and clinical applications. However, there are often demands for high accuracy, concerns about balancing generalizability and domain-specificity, and questions about prompting robustness when considering the adoption of LLMs for specific use cases. There also is a lack of a framework or method to help choose which LLMs (or prompting strategies) should be adopted for specific biomedical or clinical tasks. Objective: To address the speculations on applying LLMs for biomedical applications, this study aims to 1) propose a framework to comprehensively evaluate and compare the performance of a range of LLMs and prompting techniques on a suite of biomedical natural language processing (NLP) tasks; 2) use the framework to benchmark several general- purpose LLMs and biomedical domain-specific LLMs. Methods: We evaluated and compared six general-purpose LLMs (GPT-4, GPT-3.5-Turbo, Flan-T5-XXL, Llama-3-8B-Instruct, Yi-1.5-34B-Chat, and Zephyr-7B-Beta) and three healthcare-specific LLMs (Medicine-Llama3-8B, Meditron-7B, and MedLLaMA-13B) on a set of 13 datasets - referred to as the Biomedical Language Understanding and Reasoning Benchmark (BLURB) - covering six commonly needed medical natural language processing tasks: named entity recognition (NER); relation extraction (RE); population, interventions, comparators, and outcomes (PICO); sentence similarity (SS); document classification (Class.); and question-answering (QA). All models were evaluated without further training or fine-tuning. Model performance was assessed according to a range of prompting strategies (formalized as a systematic, reusable prompting framework) and relied on the standard, task-specific evaluation metrics defined by BLURB. Results: Across all tasks, GPT-4 outperformed other LLMs, achieving a score of 64.6 on the benchmark, though other models, such as Flan-T5-XXL and Llama-3-8B-Instruct, demonstrated competitive performance on multiple tasks. We found that general-purpose models achieved better overall scores than domain-specific models, sometimes by significant margins. We observed a substantial impact of strategically editing the prompt describing the task and a consistent improvement in performance when including examples semantically similar to the input text. Additionally, the most performant prompts for nearly half the models outperformed the previously reported best results for the PubMedQA dataset from the BLURB leaderboard. Conclusions: These results provide evidence of the potential LLMs may have for biomedical applications and highlight the importance of robust evaluation before adopting LLMs for any specific use cases. Notably, performant open-source LLMs such as Llama-3- 8B-Instruct and Flan-T5-XXL show promise for use cases where trustworthiness and data confidentiality are concerns, as these models can be hosted locally, offering better security, transparency, and explainability. Continuing to explore how these emerging technologies can be adapted for the healthcare setting, paired with human expertise, and enhanced through quality control measures will be important research to allow responsible innovation with LLMs in the biomedical area.

Automated abstraction of clinical parameters of multiple myeloma from real-world clinical notes using large language models

Automating the detection of treatment progression in patients with lung cancer using large language models.

Critical Care Studies Using Large Language Models Based on Electronic Healthcare Records: A Technical Note

Improving Clinical Expertise in Large Language Models Using Electronic Medical Records

From Text to Tables: A Local Privacy Preserving Large Language Model for Structured Information Retrieval from Medical Documents

Evaluating large language model workflows in clinical decision support: referral, triage, and diagnosis

Evaluation of Large Language Model Performance on the Biomedical Language Understanding and Reasoning Benchmark : Comparative Study

Enhancing Clinical Data Extraction from Pathology Reports: A Comparative Analysis of Large Language Models

Abstract 7390: Learning Llama Agents for medical record analysis and standardization

Large language models for extracting histopathologic diagnoses from electronic health records

Answering real-world clinical questions using large language model based systems

Evaluation of large language model performance on the Biomedical Language Understanding and Reasoning Benchmark

LLMs in Biomedicine: A study on clinical Named Entity Recognition

Approach to machine learning for extraction of real-world data variables from electronic health records

Development of a privacy preserving large language model for automated data extraction from thyroid cancer pathology reports

Large language models for precision oncology: Clinical decision support through expert-guided learning.

Privacy-preserving large language models for structured medical information retrieval

Language Models and Retrieval Augmented Generation for Automated Structured Data Extraction from Diagnostic Reports

Leveraging Large Language Models for Decision Support in Personalized Oncology

Natural Language Programming in Medicine: Administering Evidence Based Clinical Workflows with Autonomous Agents Powered by Generative Large Language Models