Abstract:Land-use change is considered the greatest threat to nature, having caused worldwide declines in the abundance, diversity, and health of species and ecosystems. Despite increasing research on this global change driver, there are still challenges to forming an effective synthesis. The estimated impact of land-use change on biodiversity can depend on location, research methods, and taxonomic focus, with recent global meta-analyses reaching disparate conclusions. Here we critically appraise this research body and our ability to reach a reliable consensus. We employ named entity recognition to analyse more than 4000 abstracts, alongside full reading of 100 randomly selected papers. We highlight the broad range of study designs and methodologies used; the most common being local space-for-time comparisons that classify land use in situ. Species metrics including abundance, distribution, and diversity were measured more frequently than complex responses such as demography, vital rates, and behaviour.We identified taxonomic biases, with vertebrates well represented whilst detritivores were largely missing. Omitting this group may hinder our understanding of how land-use change affects ecosystem feedbacks. Research was heavily biased towards temperate forested biomes in North America and Europe, with warmer regions being acutely underrepresented despite offering potential insights into the future effects of land-use change under novel climates. Various land use histories were covered, although more research in understudied regions including Africa and the Middle East is required to capture regional differences in the form of current and historical land use practices. Failure to address these challenges will impede our global understanding of land-use change impacts on biodiversity, limit the reliability of future projections, and have repercussions for the conservation of threatened species. Beyond identifying literature biases, we highlight the research priorities and data gaps that need urgent attention and offer perspectives on how to move forwards.

Future climate and land use change will equally impact global terrestrial vertebrate diversity

Future effects of climate and land-use change on terrestrial vertebrate community diversity under different scenarios

Global habitat loss and extinction risk of terrestrial vertebrates under future land-use-change scenarios

Shaping the Future: the importance of land use when projecting the future distribution of Endangered Amphibians and Reptiles.

Climate and land-use changes reduce the benefits of terrestrial protected areas

Impacts of future agricultural change on ecosystem service indicators

Global sustainability scenarios lead to regionally different outcomes for terrestrial biodiversity

Global effects of land use on local terrestrial biodiversity

Global inequities and political borders challenge nature conservation under climate change

Global expansion of human-wildlife overlap in the 21st century

Anthropogenic climate and land-use change drive short- and long-term biodiversity shifts across taxa

Land‐use change and biodiversity: Challenges for assembling evidence on the greatest threat to nature

Comparing the impact of future cropland expansion on global biodiversity and carbon storage across models and scenarios

Land use imperils plant and animal community stability through changes in asynchrony rather than diversity

Global trends and scenarios for terrestrial biodiversity and ecosystem services from 1900 to 2050

Reassessment of the risks of climate change for terrestrial ecosystems

Projecting shifts in the distributions of Chinese endemic vertebrate species under climate and land-use change

Vertebrate population trends are influenced by interactions between land use, climatic position, habitat loss and climate change

Future temperature extremes threaten land vertebrates

Projected patterns of land uses in Africa under a warming climate

Vulnerability of the global terrestrial ecosystems to climate change