Habitat filtering but not microbiota origin controls microbiome transplant outcomes in soil

Senka Causevic,Janko Tackmann,Vladimir Sentchilo,Lukas Malfertheiner,Christian von Mering,Jan Roelof van der Meer
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.12.12.627922
2024-12-12
Abstract:Human activities cause global losses of soil microbiome diversity and functionality. Microbiota transplants offer a potential solution, but the factors influencing transplant success remain unclear. We investigated how microbiota origin (thereby niche preference) affects microbiome mergers, hypothesizing that native strains are better adapted to their habitat and will outcompete non-native ones. Hence, we contrasted transplants in soil microcosms between two diverse topsoil (SoilCom) or lakewater (LakeCom) communities with a community of 21 soil bacteria (SynCom). In both cases, SynCom transplant caused productivity increases and permanent compositional shifts, but its abundance in either merger dropped from 50-80% to <1% within two months. All (even non-merged) communities resembled natural soils in comparisons to over 81,000 available soil, sediment and lake microbiomes. Our results show that habitat filtering and niche competition, more than microbiota origin, determine transplant outcomes. Despite the limited proliferation of SynCom transplants, their capacity to influence community trajectories long-term opens new paths for microbiome engineering.
Microbiology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?