Title: An Individually Tailored, Home-Based Supervised Exercise Programme for People with Early Dementia: An RCT-informed Health Economic Evaluation.

Victory Segun Ezeofor,Ned Hartfiel,Kodchawan Doungsong,Sarah Goldberg,Veronika van der Wardt,Louise Howe,John Gladman,Rowan H Harwood,Rhiannon Tudor Edwards
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.12.10.24318781
2024-12-11
Abstract:Background: The effectiveness of exercise interventions to improve activities of daily living function in people with dementia is inconclusive. This study aimed to assess the long-term cost-effectiveness of the PrAISED intervention from a National Health Service (NHS) perspective. Method: This novel robust economic analysis used a Markov model to evaluate the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) over a lifetime horizon of 15 years for a cohort of patients. Sensitivity analyses were conducted to investigate the uncertainty and robustness of high-impacting parameters and results. Results: This study included 365 adults, aged 65 years and above with 183 and 182 randomised to the PrAISED and standard care groups respectively. The PrAISED intervention had mean per-patient cost of &pound60,465 for the PrAISED arm and &pound54,604 for standard care. The Praised intervention gained an incremental QALYs of 0.05 resulting in an ICER of &pound129,614 per QALY. The sensitivity analysis of the intervention cost varied the ICER value between &pound68,173 and &pound191,054/QALY. To achieve the recommended NICE willingness to pay threshold value of less than &pound30,000/QALYs would require the intervention cost to be reduced from &pound1,236 (current cost) to &pound263 to break even and be cost-effective. The sensitivity analyses revealed that there was a 40% probability of standard care dominating the PrAISED treatment. Conclusions: Although the PrAISED intervention was a low-cost intervention, it did not produce a cost-effective intervention in this analysis. The flexibility of the PrAISED program to adapt to government policy during the COVID-19 pandemic was positive. Keywords: Life-time Horizon, Quality-of-life, Cost-effectiveness, Dementia, quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER).
What problem does this paper attempt to address?