Abstract:BackgroundEvolutionary histories can be discordant across the genome, and such discordances need to be considered in reconstructing the species phylogeny. ASTRAL is one of the leading methods for inferring species trees from gene trees while accounting for gene tree discordance. ASTRAL uses dynamic programming to search for the tree that shares the maximum number of quartet topologies with input gene trees, restricting itself to a predefined set of bipartitions.ResultsWe introduce ASTRAL-III, which substantially improves the running time of ASTRAL-II and guarantees polynomial running time as a function of both the number of species (n) and the number of genes (k). ASTRAL-III limits the bipartition constraint set (X) to grow at most linearly with n and k. Moreover, it handles polytomies more efficiently than ASTRAL-II, exploits similarities between gene trees better, and uses several techniques to avoid searching parts of the search space that are mathematically guaranteed not to include the optimal tree. The asymptotic running time of ASTRAL-III in the presence of polytomies is O(nk)1.726D\documentclass[12pt]{minimal}\usepackage{amsmath}\usepackage{wasysym}\usepackage{amsfonts}\usepackage{amssymb}\usepackage{amsbsy}\usepackage{mathrsfs}\usepackage{upgreek}\setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt}\begin{document}$O\left ((nk)^{1.726} D \right)$\end{document} where D=O(nk) is the sum of degrees of all unique nodes in input trees. The running time improvements enable us to test whether contracting low support branches in gene trees improves the accuracy by reducing noise. In extensive simulations, we show that removing branches with very low support (e.g., below 10%) improves accuracy while overly aggressive filtering is harmful. We observe on a biological avian phylogenomic dataset of 14K genes that contracting low support branches greatly improve results.ConclusionsASTRAL-III is a faster version of the ASTRAL method for phylogenetic reconstruction and can scale up to 10,000 species. With ASTRAL-III, low support branches can be removed, resulting in improved accuracy.

Advances and applications of the closest-tree algorithm and Hadamard conjugation in phylogenetic inference

Computing the probability of gene trees concordant with the species tree in the multispecies coalescent

Efficient Bayesian species tree inference under the multi-species coalescent

Bayesian Inference of Species Trees from Multilocus Data

Fast phylogeny reconstruction through learning of ancestral sequences

Distance to the stochastic part of phylogenetic varieties

Maximum Likelihood Estimation for Unrooted 3-Leaf Trees: An Analytic Solution for the CFN Model

Heterotachy and long-branch attraction in phylogenetics

Branch Length Transforms using Optimal Tree Metric Matching

Learning from an Artificial Neural Network in Phylogenetics

A Variational Approach to Bayesian Phylogenetic Inference

Data Requirement for Phylogenetic Inference from Multiple Loci: A New Distance Method

Exact Algorithms and Experiments for Hierarchical Tree Clustering

A New Phylogenetic Inference Based on Genetic Attribute Reduction for Morphological Data.

ASTRAL-III: polynomial time species tree reconstruction from partially resolved gene trees

Statistical Phylogenetic Tree Analysis Using Differences of Means

Ranked Subtree Prune and Regraft

Ultrafast learning of 4-node hybridization cycles in phylogenetic networks using algebraic invariants

Variational Supertrees for Bayesian Phylogenetics

Coalescent-based species tree estimation: a stochastic Farris transform