Neural sensitivity to translational self‐ and object‐motion velocities
Valentina Sulpizio,Alessandro von Gal,Gaspare Galati,Patrizia Fattori,Claudio Galletti,Sabrina Pitzalis
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.26571
IF: 4.8
2024-01-14
Human Brain Mapping
Abstract:In the current study we manipulated the relative motion velocity between the observer (self‐motion or SM) and the object (OM) within a stationary scene as a strategy to test how the brain accomplishes object‐motion detection. Here, we demonstrated that three key regions of dorsal visual system, such as MT+, V6+, and V3A, are fundamental to implement such a critical computation since they are modulated by both self‐ and object‐motion velocities and showed a multivoxel pattern reflecting different object‐motion velocities, hence reflecting their possible role in discriminating between distinct velocities of self‐ and object‐motion. We suggest that these egomotion regions may be involved in the complex computation required for detecting scene‐relative object‐motion during self‐motion. The ability to detect and assess world‐relative object‐motion is a critical computation performed by the visual system. This computation, however, is greatly complicated by the observer's movements, which generate a global pattern of motion on the observer's retina. How the visual system implements this computation is poorly understood. Since we are potentially able to detect a moving object if its motion differs in velocity (or direction) from the expected optic flow generated by our own motion, here we manipulated the relative motion velocity between the observer and the object within a stationary scene as a strategy to test how the brain accomplishes object‐motion detection. Specifically, we tested the neural sensitivity of brain regions that are known to respond to egomotion‐compatible visual motion (i.e., egomotion areas: cingulate sulcus visual area, posterior cingulate sulcus area, posterior insular cortex [PIC], V6+, V3A, IPSmot/VIP, and MT+) to a combination of different velocities of visually induced translational self‐ and object‐motion within a virtual scene while participants were instructed to detect object‐motion. To this aim, we combined individual surface‐based brain mapping, task‐evoked activity by functional magnetic resonance imaging, and parametric and representational similarity analyses. We found that all the egomotion regions (except area PIC) responded to all the possible combinations of self‐ and object‐motion and were modulated by the self‐motion velocity. Interestingly, we found that, among all the egomotion areas, only MT+, V6+, and V3A were further modulated by object‐motion velocities, hence reflecting their possible role in discriminating between distinct velocities of self‐ and object‐motion. We suggest that these egomotion regions may be involved in the complex computation required for detecting scene‐relative object‐motion during self‐motion.
radiology, nuclear medicine & medical imaging,neurosciences,neuroimaging