Dynamic AI-assisted Ipsilateral Tissue Matching for Digital Breast Tomosynthesis

Stephen James Morrell,Michael Huetel,Oeslle Alexandre Soares Lucena,Cristina Roxana Vergara Alfaro,Sophia O'Brien,Samantha Zuckerman,Sebastien Ourselin,Jorge Cardoso,Juliet Morel,Emily Conant
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.12.02.24318238
2024-12-05
Abstract:Abstract Background: Digital Breast Tomosynthesis (DBT) improves cancer detection rates by 30-40% compared to 2D mammography, but requires radiologists to mentally match suspicious tissue between views and slices. A pilot study revealed a 23% error rate in tissue site matching among specialists, with potentially significant consequences when cancers are missed. This challenge is particularly acute since 70% of US mammograms are interpreted by non-specialist radiologists [12]. Purpose: To quantify the improvement in tissue matching accuracy when radiologists use AI assistance (ViewFinder) compared to traditional mental matching in Digital Breast Tomosynthesis interpretation, with particular focus on non-expert readers analyzing challenging cases. Materials and Methods: In this retrospective multi-center study, 12 radiologists (7 experts, 5 non-experts) from different institutions evaluated 94 lesion clusters in Digital Breast Tomosynthesis images between May 2018 and November 2021. Readers performed annotations with and without AI assistance after a minimum four-week washout period. The study measured root mean squared error (RMSE) and maximum distance errors against gold standard annotations. Statistical significance was assessed using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Results: A total of 94 lesion clusters were analyzed by 12 radiologists (mean age, 42 years +/- 8). For abnormal cases without warnings of AI uncertainty, AI assistance reduced average RMSE by 32% (11.70mm +/- 0.45 vs 8.88mm +/- 0.46, p = 0.049) and maximum distance errors by 37.5% (20.68mm +/- 0.86 vs 15.08mm +/- 0.91, p = 0.036). Non-expert radiologists showed the greatest improvement, with RMSE reduction of 61.9% (12.20mm +/- 0.82 vs 7.57mm +/- 0.75, p = 0.010) and maximum distance error reduction of 67.5% (15.76mm +/- 0.93 vs 9.47mm +/- 0.97, p = 0.028) in abnormal cases. Conclusion: Dynamic AI-assisted tissue matching significantly improves localization accuracy in Digital Breast Tomosynthesis interpretation, particularly for non-expert radiologists analyzing challenging cases.
Radiology and Imaging
What problem does this paper attempt to address?