Reflective Learning from Implementing Care Pathways for Vulnerable Infants and Their Mothers: Case Studies from Pakistan, South Sudan and Yemen.

Hedwig Deconinck,Stephanie V Wrottesley,Saba Shahid,Angelina Nasira Boi,Pascal Mane Luka,Marlene Traore Hebie,Kirk Dearden,Ahmed Aljabi,Emily Hirata,Marie McGrath
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.12.02.24318218
2024-12-03
Abstract:Many infants are born vulnerable or become vulnerable in the first 6 months of life, putting them at risk of poor growth and development, long-term ill-health, and increased mortality. Many policies and practitioners aim to integrate care across services for at-risk mother infant pairs, but this is challenging in practice given individual, setting, and policy complexities. The MAMI Care Pathway, an integrated care pathway approach, frames and guides implementation of WHO nutrition and health guidelines within health and nutrition systems. Local contextualization is a pre-requisite for evidencing national policy uptake of relevant global recommendations. To gain insight into such contextualization, we undertook three in-depth country case studies to investigate planning, implementation, adoption, and scalability of the approach with practitioners in Pakistan, South Sudan, and Yemen. Our mixed methods using theoretical frameworks explored planning, implementation, normalization, and sustainable scalability of the care pathway. We explored healthcare workers' perspectives through in- and cross-country reflective learning discussion. Initiatives were prompted by perceived but unmeasured need. Planning and starting implementation required substantial time and stakeholder consultation. Healthcare workers needed skills to perform existing tasks (reflecting shortfalls in routine care capacity and quality) as well as new ones (e.g. maternal mental health). Shifting from disease-focused to person-centred care required (and did not always get) buy-in from healthcare workers (where it was not embedded in service duties and pay), and from communities and mothers to adopt it (practical and competing priorities). It was possible to be system-supportive and scale-sensitive in emergency contexts. Identified commonalities in implementation realities heighten transferable learning potential. Health system strengthening is needed for impactful scale. A paradigm shift towards person-centred care is needed in policy framing and implementation guidance. Deeper localized case study development is a critical type of evidence to inform policy navigation, development and practice.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?