Quantitative analysis of gas chromatography-coupled electroantennographic detection (GC-EAD) of plant volatiles by insects

Kelsey Jaye Ruth Paularena Byers,Robert Nathan Jacobs

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.12.01.626223

2024-12-03

Abstract:Premise: Plant-interacting insects receive plant volatile signals through their antennae, and voltage changes across an antenna exposed to volatile stimuli can be measured to determine if insects can perceive them, often by coupling gas chromatography to electroantennographic detection (GC-EAD). Current methods for analysing GC-EAD data rely on qualitative observation, rather than using quantitative analysis, and are thus prone to bias. Methods and Results: We developed a novel quantitative methodology for analysis of GC-EAD data using a signal processing technique on EAD data to compare responses of hawkmoths and bumble bees to a library of common floral volatiles. Responses varied between species and sexes and these responses were in some cases affected by compound type or modification. Conclusions: Our novel GC-EAD analysis technique is robust to baseline drift and low signal:noise ratios commonly found in GC-EAD data, and provides a way forward for quantitative studies of plant volatile-mediated plant-insect interactions.

Plant Biology

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The main problem that this paper attempts to solve is the limitations of current gas chromatography - electroantennogram (GC - EAD) data analysis methods. Specifically, the existing GC - EAD data analysis relies on qualitative observations rather than quantitative analysis, which leads to the subjectivity and non - repeatability of the results. The author points out that this method is prone to introducing biases and is difficult to compare between different studies.

To solve these problems, the author has developed a new quantitative analysis method, using signal processing techniques to process and analyze GC - EAD data. This method can more accurately identify the responses of insects to plant volatiles, thereby improving the reliability and repeatability of the research.

### Specific Problems and Solutions

1. **Limitations of Qualitative Analysis**:
- The existing methods mainly rely on visual judgment, determining whether insects respond to specific compounds by comparing the time of GC - FID peaks with EAD readings.
- This method is easily affected by baseline drift and signal noise, resulting in inaccurate and difficult - to - repeat results.

2. **Requirement for Quantitative Analysis**:
- To overcome these limitations, the author proposes a new method based on signal processing techniques, especially using **First Forward Difference (FFD)** to process EAD signals.
- FFD can remove the influence of baseline drift, convert the EAD signal into a series of independent spikes, and thus it is easier to identify significant responses.

3. **Advantages of the New Method**:
- The new method can set a significance threshold (usually the mean ± 3 standard deviations) within each time window and calculate the spike frequency exceeding this threshold.
- This enables researchers to quantitatively evaluate whether GC - EAD peaks are physiologically active using traditional statistical methods, rather than just relying on the qualitative "yes/no" judgment.

### Application Examples

The author used this method to analyze the responses of two insects (Manduca sexta moths and Bombus terrestris audax bumblebees) to 28 common plant volatiles. The results showed:

- **Moths**: Female moths have a stronger response to fatty acid derivatives and certain aromatic compounds, while male moths have a weaker response.
- **Bumblebees**: They respond to multiple compound classes, but have no obvious response to nitrogen compounds such as indole.

In conclusion, this paper aims to improve the accuracy and reliability of GC - EAD data analysis by introducing a new quantitative analysis method, thereby better understanding the interactions between plant volatiles and insects.