Abstract:Countering the impacts of habitat loss and fragmentation on ecosystems requires complementing conservation areas with Other Effective area-based Conservation Measures within landscapes to promote biodiversity and multiple ecosystem services (ES). However, critical knowledge gaps persist in where and how natural elements should be restored to improve landscape connectivity to simultaneously support, and reduce trade-offs between biodiversity and ES. In virtual landscape experiments that allow exploring the effects of spatial pattern systematically, we generated alternative landscape restoration scenarios aimed at fostering ecological connectivity. Scenarios varied in the location and size of restored areas complementing existing natural areas. We analysed the impact of these scenarios on four bundles representing distinct priorities of target ES and biodiversity-related values. As expected, all bundles were favoured by increasing restored area in the landscape, but they were promoted by different spatial configurations. Restoration scenarios that fostered high aggregation of natural habitats promoted biodiversity and cultural value-related bundles, while smaller natural elements dispersed throughout the landscape were more beneficial for the sustainable production and climate adaptation bundles. These contrasts were most pronounced at low restoration efforts, where landscape configuration had greatest impacts on biodiversity and ecosystem processes. Effective spatial planning of restoration initiatives within landscapes should consider these trade-offs, along with context-specific constraints, when prioritizing areas for restoration or conservation. Our findings contribute to a more comprehensive understanding of how protected and restored areas can be integrated within landscapes to jointly support connectivity for both biodiversity and people.

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The main problem that this paper attempts to solve is how to make trade - offs between ecosystem services (ES) and biodiversity during the process of landscape connectivity restoration. Specifically, the study aims to explore the impacts of spatial configurations under different restoration scenarios on multiple ecosystem services and biodiversity bundles, as well as the differences in these impacts under different restoration goals. ### Research Background and Problems With the habitat loss and fragmentation caused by human activities, ecosystems and the services they provide have been seriously affected. In order to promote biodiversity and multiple ecosystem services, researchers need to understand how natural elements should be restored in the landscape to improve connectivity and reduce the trade - offs between biodiversity and ecosystem services. However, there are still knowledge gaps regarding where and how to restore natural elements to support multiple ecosystem services and biodiversity simultaneously. ### Main Research Questions 1. **Impacts of Spatial Configurations in Different Restoration Scenarios on Ecosystem Services and Biodiversity**: The study generates different restoration scenarios through virtual landscape experiments and analyzes the impacts of these scenarios on four ecosystem services and biodiversity bundles. 2. **Impacts of Restoration Goals on Results**: The study explores whether the impacts of spatial configurations on ecosystem services and biodiversity are different under different restoration goals (5%, 10%, 20%). 3. **Trade - offs in Spatial Configurations**: The study focuses on the specific impacts of high - aggregation and low - aggregation restoration scenarios on different ecosystem services and biodiversity bundles. ### Specific Questions - **High - aggregation Restoration Scenario**: In this scenario, the restored natural elements are highly aggregated, which promotes biodiversity and cultural values. - **Low - aggregation Restoration Scenario**: In this scenario, smaller natural elements are scattered throughout the landscape, which is more beneficial for sustainable production and climate adaptation. - **Impacts of Restoration Goals**: Under lower restoration goals, the impacts of landscape configurations on biodiversity and ecosystem processes are more significant. Through these analyses, the study hopes to provide a scientific basis for landscape restoration planning, especially in terms of how to effectively balance the requirements of biodiversity and ecosystem services when considering different restoration goals and spatial configurations.

One cannot have it all: trading-off ecosystem services and biodiversity bundles in landscape connectivity restoration

The Importance of Spatial Configuration When Restoring Intensive Production Landscapes for Biodiversity and Ecosystem Service Multifunctionality

Hypoglycemia-associated autonomic failure in advanced type 2 diabetes.

Evaluating complementary networks of restoration plantings for landscape-scale occurrence of temporally dynamic species

A Framework to Optimize Biodiversity Restoration Efforts Based on Habitat Amount and Landscape Connectivity

A 5-year experience with 307 CT-guided renal biopsies: results and complications.

Linking Restoration and Landscape Ecology

Identifying the optimal landscape configuration for landscape multifunctionality

Step back from the forest and step up to the Bonn Challenge: How a broad ecological perspective can promote successful landscape restoration

Quantifying synergistic effects of multi-temporal ecosystem service bundles for degraded ecosystem restoration: A case study in Hubei Province, China

Cost-effective integrated conservation and restoration priorities by trading off multiple ecosystem services

Multi-objective forest restoration planning in Costa Rica: Balancing landscape connectivity and ecosystem service provisioning with sustainable development

Identifying restoration hotspots that deliver multiple ecological benefits

Templates for multifunctional landscape design

The biodiversity and ecosystem service contributions and trade-offs of forest restoration approaches

Integrating habitat availability into restoration efforts for biodiversity conservation: Evaluating effectiveness and setting priorities

Exploring ecosystem services trade-offs using the Bayesian belief network model for ecological restoration decision-making: A case study in Guizhou Province, China

Integrating a landscape connectivity approach into mitigation hierarchy planning by anticipating urban dynamics

Simulating spatial complexity in dry conifer forest restoration: implications for conservation prioritization and scenario evaluation

Barriers to ecological restoration in Europe: expert perspectives

Identifying trade-offs between biodiversity conservation and ecosystem services delivery for land-use decisions