A-tDCS over DLPFC is no more effective than placebo in improving cognition and pain-experience in chronic lower back pain

Emily J Corti,Welber Marinovic,An T Nguyen,Natalie Gasson,Andrea M Loftus
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.11.25.24317873
2024-11-28
Abstract:Chronic pain is associated with deficits in cognitive functioning and increased pain intensity. Research investigating the potential for transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) to improve cognitive functioning, pain experience, and psychological health in individuals with chronic lower back pain (CLBP) yield mixed results. The present randomised, placebo-controlled study examined the impact of anodal-tDCS over left-dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (left-DLPFC) on cognitive functioning, pain experience, and psychological health in those with CLBP. Thirty participants with CLBP (Mage = 57.47 years, SDage = 14.28 years) received 20-minutes of sham or anodal tDCS, twice weekly, for 4 weeks. Cognitive functioning was assessed using two measures for each of the five cognitive domains; memory, attention and working memory, executive function, visuospatial, and language. Cognition, pain experience, and psychological health were assessed prior to and immediately following the tDCS intervention. Linear Mixed Models revealed a significant tDCS group and time interaction on an attention and working memory task, whereby participants in the a-tDCS showed a significant improvement on the letter number sequencing task at post-intervention. There was a significant main effect of time for both tDCS groups across the five cognitive domains. Both groups demonstrated a significant improvement on at least one measure for each of the five cognitive domains. Linear Mixed Models revealed there was a significant main effect of time for both tDCS groups on pain intensity, disability, catastrophising, anxiety, and stress, whereby both groups demonstrated a significant reduction on these outcome measures. There was a significant main effect of time for both tDCS groups on quality of life, whereby both groups demonstrated a significant improvement in quality of life. There was no significant main effect of tDCS group or interaction between tDCS group and time on pain intensity, disability, catastrophising, anxiety, stress, and quality of life. These findings suggest anodal-tDCS over left-DLPFC is no more effective than sham-tDCS in improving cognition, pain experience, and psychological health in those with CLBP.
Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?