Abstract:Abstract Frequencies of synonymous codons are typically non-uniform, despite the fact that such codons correspond to the same amino acid in the genetic code. This phenomenon, known as codon bias, is broadly believed to be due to a combination of factors including genetic drift, mutational biases, and selection for speed and accuracy of codon translation; however, quantitative modeling of codon bias has been elusive. We have developed a biophysical population genetics model which explains genome-wide codon frequencies observed across 20 organisms. We assume that codons evolve independently of each other under the influence of mutation and selection forces, and that the codon population has reached evolutionary steady state. Our model implements codon-level treatment of mutations with transition/transversion biases, and includes two contributions to codon fitness which describe codon translation speed and accuracy. Furthermore, our model includes wobble pairing – the possibility of codon-anticodon base pairing mismatches at the 3’ nucleotide position of the codon. We find that the observed patterns of genome-wide codon usage are consistent with a strong selective penalty for mistranslated amino acids. Thus codons undergo purifying selection and their relative frequencies are affected in part by mutational robustness. We find that the dependence of codon fitness on translation speed is weaker on average compared to the strength of selection against mistranslation. Although no constraints on codon-anticodon pairing are imposed a priori , a reasonable hierarchy of pairing rates, which conforms to the wobble hypothesis and is consistent with available structural evidence, emerges spontaneously as a model prediction. Finally, treating the translation process explicitly in the context of a finite ribosomal pool has allowed us to estimate mutation rates per nucleotide directly from the coding sequences. Reminiscent of Drake’s observation that mutation rates are inversely correlated with the genome size, we predict that mutation rates are inversely proportional to the number of genes. Overall, our approach offers a unified biophysical and population genetics framework for studying codon bias across all domains of life.

Evidence for non-optimal codon choice in highly transcribed sex-biased genes of Drosophila melanogaster

Genome-wide impact of codon usage bias on translation optimization in Drosophila melanogaster

Variable Strength of Translational Selection Among 12 Drosophila Species

Variation in the fitness impact of translationally optimal codons among animals

Preferred synonymous codons are translated more accurately: Proteomic evidence, among-species variation, and mechanistic basis

Sex-Biased Transcriptome Evolution in Drosophila

Selection on codon bias in yeast: a transcriptional hypothesis

Codon Usage Bias and Effective Population Sizes on the X Chromosome versus the Autosomes in Drosophila melanogaster

Gene length and codon usage bias in Drosophila melanogaster, Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Escherichia coli

Expression divergence in response to sex-biased selection

Intragenic spatial patterns of codon usage bias in prokaryotic and eukaryotic genomes

Codon clusters with biased synonymous codon usage represent hidden functional domains in protein-coding DNA sequences

Codon Optimality Controls Differential Mrna Translation During Amino Acid Starvation.

Synonymous but not the same: the causes and consequences of codon bias

Inferring biophysical models of evolution from genome-wide patterns of codon usage

No evidence that selection on synonymous codon usage affects patterns of protein evolution in bacteria

Growth-dependent gene expression variation influences the strength of codon usage biases

Variation in the strength of selected codon usage bias among bacteria

Solving the riddle of codon usage preferences: a test for translational selection.

Evolution of tRNA pool shapes variation in selection on codon usage across the Saccharomycotina subphylu