Abstract P1-01-13: Intraoperative evaluation of sentinel lymph nodes using touch imprint cytology in patients with early-stage breast cancer: A series of 4367 procedures
Y Chen,J Chen,B Yang,L Li,X Huang,Z Shao,Z Shen,J Wu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.sabcs13-p1-01-13
2013-01-01
Abstract:Abstract Background: As the screening for breast cancer becomes common in China, an increasing number of early-stage breast cancer has been detected. For those patients, especially the ones with cliniaclly negetive lymph nodes, sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) plays an important role in the assessment of the axillary status, while minimizing the mobidity of axillary lymph node dissection(ALND). Accurate intraoperative assessment of SLN metastases enables the selection of patients for ALND during the same operation. Touch imprint cytology (TIC) serves as a main intraoperative evaluation of SLNs in our institute since Feb-2005. The purpose of this study is to evaluate its clinical value. Methods: Early-stage breast cancer patients treated in our institute between Feb-2005 and Apr-2013 enrolled in this study. To avoid breast tissue contamination, all patients had an intraoperative SLNB performed before undergoing lumpectomy or mastectomy. The fresh SLNs were sectioned into 1.5-3.0mm pieces along the short axis, TIC was performed on both surfaces of each piece, its result was correlated with the histological assessments with Hematoxylin-Eosin (H&E) staining, which considered as the gold standard. Results: A total of 4,367 early-stage breast cancer patients enrolled in the study, and 14,112 SLNs were successfully harvested. Among those, 917 (21.0%) patients were confirmed to have at least one SLN positive for metastases, and 1343 (9.5%) positive SLNs were removed. Based on the final H&E report, the sensitivity, specificity and overall accuracy of TIC was 71.4%, 99.2% and 93.6%, respectively on a per patient basis, and 69.6%, 99.5% and 96.6%, respectively on a per node basis. The sensitivity for macrometastasis and micrometastasis was 74.8% and 26.5%, respectively on a per patient basis, and 78.9% and 25.2%, respectively on a per node basis. To discuss the influence of error results on the surgery procedure, we further reviewed the detail medical records of the patients enrolled in the recent 3 years. Of all the 3290 patiens treated between Jun-2010 and Apr-2013, 207(6.5%) patients needed a second opereation to have the ALN dissected. Meanwhile, 20(0.6%) patients had undergone extra ALND because of the false positive results of TIC. Conclusion: The sensitivity of TIC seems a little lower then the ones reported previously, but the overall accuracy still remains acceptable. In addition, only 7.1% patients were influenced by the error results of TIC, along with the advantages, such as the shorter preparation time and the less cost of cytological specimens, we consider TIC a feasible method, and believe it can serve well in the intraoperative evaluation of SLNs for early-stage breast cancer patients. Citation Information: Cancer Res 2013;73(24 Suppl): Abstract nr P1-01-13.