Abstract:Abstract Background: Beside factors such as measurement technique, equipment accuracy, patient anxiety, race, ethnicity, ecological factors, diet (high sodium and calorie intake, and low potassium), physical inactivity, health conditions, and genetic vulnerability also influence blood pressure. Iodinated contrast agents (ICAs) or media (ICMs) are widely applied to improve the visibility of internal organs and other tissues in computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) procedures. ICAs have transient vasodilatory properties which can influence hemodynamic parameters immediately after administration during CT scans. Discrepancies on the effects of ICAs following their administration on hemodynamic parameters in adult patients who underwent contrast-enhanced CT (CECT) examinations have been reported in the literature. Anecdotal evidence further suggests that limited studies of the subject in Ghana. Knowledge of the relationship between hemodynamic parameters and contrast media is needed for prompt treatment, as well as the development of protocols to govern the administration of ICAs. Aim: This study therefore evaluated HR, systolic blood pressure (SBP), and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) levels in adult patients following administration of non-ionic ICA during CECT examinations. Methodology: Since data of the study variables were collected prospectively (before and after CT examinations) to determine SBP and DBP and HR levels following administration of non-ionic ICA during CT examinations, a prospective case-control study design was used, while a non-probability convenience sampling was employed to sample a population of 128 patients consisting of equal numbers of cases (experimental) and controls groups. Measurements of HR, SPB and DBP were made before and after the scans in both groups. Data analyses were done with Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 23. Pearson and Spearman correlations were used to compare the data variables obtained between the cases and control group. A p-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: The measured mean values of HR, SBP and DBP were higher after contrast administration (HR=84.75±14.00 bpm; SBP =128.39±17.98 mmHg; DBP= 80.00 ± 13.26 mmHg) than before (HR=82.56±15.08 bpm; SBP=120.81±14.32 mmHg; DBP=78.94±11.90 mmHg). There were insignificant differences between HR and SBP (p =0.716) and DBP (p = 0.533) prior to contrast media. The HR increase was statistically significant after contrast media (p=0.008). The mean differences in the HR, SBP, and DBP between genders were statistically insignificant after contrast administration. Conclusions: Administration of non-ionic ICA increases HR but had no effects on SBP and DBP in both male and female adult patients who underwent diverse CECT examinations. The correlation statistics established no significant relationship between doses of contrast media and increases in the HR. No statistically significant differences between patient gender, BMI, and age on the hemodynamic parameters were found. Keywords: Computed tomography, contrast media, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, heart rate.

Evaluation of hemodynamic parameters in adult patients following administration of non-ionic intravenous contrast agents in computed tomography examinations in a tertiary hospital in Ghana.

Study on the Optimized Scanning Conditions of Cerebral CT Angiography Based on the Angiographic CT Head Phantom

Clinical effectiveness of contrast medium injection protocols for 80-kV coronary and craniocervical CT angiography—a prospective multicenter observational study

Application of Low Tube Voltage, Low-concentration Contrast Agent Using a 320-row CT in Coronary CT Angiography: Evaluation of Image Quality, Radiation Dose and Iodine Intake

Survey of CT radiation doses and iodinated contrast medium administration: an international multicentric study

The Diverse Utility of Contrast Media Delivery and Dosing During Computed Tomography: An International Assessment of Knowledge and Practices

Effect of patient characteristics on aortic attenuation in iodinated contrast-enhanced Abdominopelvic CT: A retrospective study

Impact of iodine concentration and iodine delivery rate on contrast enhancement in coronary CT angiography: a randomized multicenter trial (CT-CON)

Effect of Low Contrast Dose and Low Tube Voltage Combined with Adaptive Statistical Iterative Reconstruction in the Image Quality of Abdominal CT Angiography

Influence of Contrast Media Temperature and Concentration on Patient Comfort and Safety in Computed Tomography

Relationship Between Patient-Friendly Audiovisual Systems and MRI Contrast Agent to Adverse Reactions

Impact of reducing iodinated intravenous contrast volume in brain CT on image diagnostic quality

Effect of Different Iodine Concentrations on Patient-Reported Discomfort in Contrast-Enhanced Computed Tomography: A Prospective Comparative Trial

A comparison study of radiation effective dose in ECG-Gated Coronary CT Angiography and calcium scoring examinations performed with a dual-source CT scanner

Evaluation of the acute adverse reaction of contrast medium with high and moderate iodine concentration in patients undergoing computed tomography

Influence of Contrast Agent Injection Scheme Customized by Dual-Source CT Based on Automatic Tube Voltage Technology on Image Quality and Radiation Dose of Coronary Artery Imaging

Impact of intravenous access site on attenuation for thoracic computed tomographic angiography: A time-matched, nested, case-control study

Evaluation of a High Concentrated Contrast Media Injection Protocol in Combination with Low Tube Current for Dose Reduction in Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography: A Randomized, Two-center Prospective Study.

Feasibility of Weight-based Tube Voltage and Iodine Delivery Rate for Coronary Artery CT Angiography.

Evaluation of image quality on low contrast media with deep learning image reconstruction algorithm in prospective ECG-triggering coronary CT angiography

Clinical audit of the image quality and customised contrast volume using P3T contrast injection software versus standard injection protocol in CT coronary angiography