Abstract:This graphical abstract illustrates the relative importance of network structure indicators in predicting food web robustness across four machine learning models: (a) Artificial neural network, (b) decision tree, (c) least absolute shrinkage and selection operator, and (d) random forest. The indicators include AD (average distance), BC (betweenness centrality), C (directional connectivity), CC (closeness centrality), D (diameter), DC (degree centrality), EBC (edge betweenness centrality), L (number of links), LD (linkage density), and N (number of nodes). According to this graph, CC has a significant impact in predicting the robustness of food webs. Food web robustness is a critical aspect of ecosystem stability and has been extensively studied in ecology. However, the potential of machine learning techniques in predicting food web robustness and the identification of key network structure indicators have not been fully explored. We compared the suitability of different machine learning methods and assessed the relative importance of network structure indicators for predicting the robustness of food webs. We utilized a variety of food web datasets spanning different ecosystems to calculate network structure indicators, which include average distance (AD), betweenness centrality (BC), directional connectivity (C), closeness centrality (CC), diameter (D), degree centrality (DC), edge betweenness centrality (EBC), number of links (L), linkage density (LD), and number of nodes (N). We then compared the performance of machine learning methods, including artificial neural network (ANN), random forest (RF), least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO), and decision tree (DT), and evaluated the relative importance of network structure indicators on robustness predictions. The results demonstrate that the RF model has the best performance (MAE = 0.0178, RMSE = 0.0263, R2 = 0.9063). Meanwhile, the CC indicator has a significant impact in predicting robustness of food webs. It is suggested that both the RF model and the CC indicator should be considered seriously in predicting food web robustness. This research elucidates the differential outcomes when various machine learning methodologies and indicators are employed to predict the robustness of food webs. It significantly enhances our understanding by demonstrating the precise capability of machine learning models in forecasting the robustness of food webs.

Predicting missing links in food webs using stacked models and species traits

Trait‐matching models predict pairwise interactions across regions, not food web properties

Learning common structures in a collection of networks. An application to food webs

What constrains food webs? A maximum entropy framework for predicting their structure with minimal biases

Network structure indicators predict ecological robustness in food webs

Trophic groups and modules: two levels of group detection in food webs

Quantitative patterns in the structure of model and empirical food webs

Linking Net Interaction Effects with Network Topologies in Food Webs

A novel method for predicting ecological interactions with an unsupervised machine learning algorithm

Untangling the roles of parasites in food webs with generative network models

Hierarchical structure and the prediction of missing links in networks

Who Is Where in Marine Food Webs? A Trait-Based Analysis of Network Positions

Link Prediction Under Imperfect Detection: Collaborative Filtering for Ecological Networks

A Statistical Social Network Model for Consumption Data in Food Webs

Machine learning algorithms to infer trait-matching and predict species interactions in ecological networks

Food-web structure and network theory: The role of connectance and size

Predicting recoverability of collapsed food webs through perturbation and dimension reduction

Robust Patterns in Food Web Structure

Network Complexity of Foodwebs

Advancing ecological networks: moving beyond binary classification to probabilistic interactions

Food webs in food webs: the micro-macro interplay of multilayered networks