Cost-effectiveness Analysis of Alternative Infant and Neonatal Rotavirus Vaccination Schedules in Malawi

Catherine Wenger,Ernest O. Asare,Jiye Kwon,Xiao C Li,Edson Mwinjiwa,Daniel Hungerford,Jobiba Chinkhumba,Khuzwayo C Jere,Nigel A Cunliffe,A David Paltiel,Virginia E. Pitzer
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.11.22.24317751
2024-11-23
Abstract:Rotavirus is the leading cause of severe diarrhea among children under five worldwide, especially in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Although vaccination is the best strategy for preventing rotavirus infection, obstacles leading to poor vaccine effectiveness undermine its impact in LMICs. This study aimed to evaluate the impact and cost-effectiveness of the current two-dose Rotarix vaccine schedule in Malawi compared to two alternative vaccine delivery schedules and a next-generation neonatal vaccine (RV3-BB) from 2025-2034. The cost-effectiveness of rotavirus vaccine strategies in Malawi was evaluated from both the government and societal perspectives using estimates of moderate-to-severe and non-severe rotavirus cases derived from a mathematical model of rotavirus transmission dynamics and published estimates of health-seeking behaviors and costs as inputs. A probabilistic sensitivity analysis was performed to evaluate the robustness of our results to parameter uncertainty. Over a ten-year time horizon, the current two-dose strategy was predicted to avert over 1.5 million cases and 90,000 disability-adjusted life-years (DALYs) and cost $104.87 per DALY averted compared to no vaccination from the government perspective. Adding a third dose at 14 weeks could avert about 1 million more cases and cost $5 million more than the current strategy. The neonatal RV3-BB vaccine could avert 1.1 million cases and 41,000 DALYs due to rotavirus and save about $3.7 million compared to the current strategy. The current rotavirus vaccine program in Malawi is cost-effective and saves lives compared to no vaccination. However, adding a third dose is likely to be cost-effective at a willingness to pay (WTP) of $138.38 per DALY averted, while switching to the neonatal RV3-BB vaccine when available is likely to be cost-effective at a WTP above $45.89 per DALY averted.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?