Epigenetic and Structural Brain Aging and their Associations with Major Depressive Disorder and Inflammatory Markers

Eileen Y Xu,Claire Green,Daniel L. McCartney,Laura Kim Mae Han,Kathryn L Evans,Rosie Walker,Danni A Gadd,Douglas Steele,Gordon Waiter,Archie Campbell,Stephen Lawrie,James H Cole,Andrew M McIntosh,Xueyi Shen,Heather C Whalley
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.11.21.24317719
2024-11-22
Abstract:Background: A growing body of evidence suggests that Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) may be associated with premature biological aging. However, most studies have examined brain-based and DNAm-based measures of biological age (BioAge) in isolation. Previous studies also suggest the relevance of inflammation, yet the relationship between MDD, BioAge and inflammation remains unclear. Method: We investigated two well-studied BioAge measures: BrainAge and DNA methylation age (DNAmAge) in Generation Scotland (GS:STRADL; BrainAge N=1,067; DNAmAge N=684; 26-76 years) and UK Biobank (UKB, BrainAge N=12,018, 45-80 years). Premature brain and DNAm aging was operationalised as 'Predicted Age Difference' (Brain-PAD and DNAm-PAD, respectively). We tested individual and additive contributions of Brain-PAD and DNAm-PAD to lifetime/current MDD using logistic regression, followed by exploratory analyses of acute inflammatory biomarkers as mediators of this relationship. Results: Lifetime MDD cases showed significantly higher BrainAge and DNAmAge, ranging from 1.60-2.45 years increase compared to controls; no differences were found for DNAmAgeHorvath or for BrainAge in UKB. Lifetime MDD associated with DNAm-PADGrimAge, DNAm-PADPhenoAge and Brain-PAD, ranging from β = .22 - .27 (UKB Brain-PAD β = .05). DNAm-PAD and Brain-PAD demonstrated shared and distinctive contributions to lifetime MDD (DNAm-PADPhenoAge plus Brain-PAD explained maximum variance, AUC=0.69, R2=9%). Six inflammation biomarkers associated with current, but not lifetime MDD; no significant mediation effects were found. Conclusions: Our findings highlight shared and distinct contributions of premature brain and DNAm aging in lifetime MDD. We found no evidence for a mediating role of inflammation, however future work utilizing more stable biomarkers may elucidate potential biological mechanisms.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?