Abstract:Background Early and reliable identification of patients with sepsis who are at high risk of mortality is important to improve clinical outcomes. However, 3 major barriers to artificial intelligence (AI) models, including the lack of interpretability, the difficulty in generalizability, and the risk of automation bias, hinder the widespread adoption of AI models for use in clinical practice. Objective This study aimed to develop and validate (internally and externally) a conformal predictor of sepsis mortality risk in patients who are critically ill, leveraging AI-assisted prediction modeling. The proposed approach enables explaining the model output and assessing its confidence level. Methods We retrospectively extracted data on adult patients with sepsis from a database collected in a teaching hospital at Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center for model training and internal validation. A large multicenter critical care database from the Philips eICU Research Institute was used for external validation. A total of 103 clinical features were extracted from the first day after admission. We developed an AI model using gradient-boosting machines to predict the mortality risk of sepsis and used Mondrian conformal prediction to estimate the prediction uncertainty. The Shapley additive explanation method was used to explain the model. Results A total of 16,746 (80%) patients from Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center were used to train the model. When tested on the internal validation population of 4187 (20%) patients, the model achieved an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.858 (95% CI 0.845-0.871), which was reduced to 0.800 (95% CI 0.789-0.811) when externally validated on 10,362 patients from the Philips eICU database. At a specified confidence level of 90% for the internal validation cohort the percentage of error predictions (n=438) out of all predictions (n=4187) was 10.5%, with 1229 (29.4%) predictions requiring clinician review. In contrast, the AI model without conformal prediction made 1449 (34.6%) errors. When externally validated, more predictions (n=4004, 38.6%) were flagged for clinician review due to interdatabase heterogeneity. Nevertheless, the model still produced significantly lower error rates compared to the point predictions by AI (n=1221, 11.8% vs n=4540, 43.8%). The most important predictors identified in this predictive model were Acute Physiology Score III, age, urine output, vasopressors, and pulmonary infection. Clinically relevant risk factors contributing to a single patient were also examined to show how the risk arose. Conclusions By combining model explanation and conformal prediction, AI-based systems can be better translated into medical practice for clinical decision-making.

Time-Series Deep Learning and Conformal Prediction for Improved Sepsis Diagnosis in Non-ICU Hospitalized Patients

Improving sepsis prediction in intensive care with SepsisAI: A clinical decision support system with a focus on minimizing false alarms

An Interpretable Machine Learning Model for Accurate Prediction of Sepsis in the ICU

DeepAISE -- An End-to-End Development and Deployment of a Recurrent Neural Survival Model for Early Prediction of Sepsis

Predicting sepsis in multi-site, multi-national intensive care cohorts using deep learning

A Machine Learning Model for Early Prediction and Detection of Sepsis in Intensive Care Unit Patients

Deep Learning in Early Prediction of Sepsis and Diagnosis

Early Prediction of Sepsis in EMR Records Using Traditional ML Techniques and Deep Learning LSTM Networks

Machine learning for early detection of sepsis: an internal and temporal validation study

Predicting sepsis using deep learning across international sites: a retrospective development and validation study

Using Machine Learning Algorithms to predict sepsis and its stages in ICU patients

Prediction of Sepsis Mortality in ICU Patients Using Machine Learning Methods

Data-Driven Machine Learning Approaches for Predicting In-Hospital Sepsis Mortality

Deep learning-based prediction of in-hospital mortality for sepsis

Machine Learning Models for Analysis of Vital Signs Dynamics: A Case for Sepsis Onset Prediction

A Comparative Study of Machine Learning-Based Early Prediction of Sepsis

Early detection of sepsis utilizing deep learning on electronic health record event sequences

Machine Learning Models for Early Prediction of Sepsis on Large Healthcare Datasets

Development and Validation of Deep-Learning-Based Sepsis and Septic Shock Early Prediction System (DeepSEPS) Using Real-World ICU Data

A Machine Learning Model for Accurate Prediction of Sepsis in ICU Patients

Development and Validation of an Interpretable Conformal Predictor to Predict Sepsis Mortality Risk: Retrospective Cohort Study