Unveiling the functional heterogeneity of endogenous tissue extracellular vesicles in skeletal muscle through multi-omics

Yizhuo Wang,Peng Lou,Xiyue Zhou,Yijing Xie,Yimeng Zhang,Shuyun Liu,Lan Li,Yanrong Lu,Meihua Wan,Jingqiu Cheng,Jingping Liu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.11.20.624461
2024-11-21
Abstract:Extracellular vesicles (EVs) have emerged as promising tools for the development of disease biomarkers and therapeutics because they can transfer various bioactive cargos between cells in vivo. A better understanding of the heterogeneous properties of EVs in vivo may provide insights into their biological roles and clinical translation potential. As a proof-of-concept, we report that different EV subpopulations from skeletal muscle tissues have distinct composition signatures and diverse biological effects on recipient cells. Multiple cell types (e.g., myoblasts and endothelial cells (ECs)) can contribute to the pool of muscle tissue-derived EVs, and large EVs (L-EVs) are enriched with proteins related to metabolic regulation, whereas small EVs (S-EVs) are enriched with original muscle cell-specific proteins related to muscle function regulation. Compared with L-EVs, S-EVs exhibited abundant surface proteins and higher cell uptake rates. Moreover, L-EVs and S-EVs can induce diverse changes in global gene expression, metabolic patterns and some cellular behaviors (e.g., proliferation and differentiation) in recipient cells. These results suggest that different EV subpopulations might control tissue hemostasis in a coordinated manner and suggest the importance of reconsidering their favorable role in future applications (e.g., S-EVs for biomarker discovery and L-EVs for metabolic intervention). This study highlights the functional heterogeneity of tissue-derived EVs in vivo, and the selection of an ideal EV subset on the basis of its specific biological properties may be a promising strategy for developing more precise biomarkers or tailored EV therapies for regenerative medicine.
Biology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?