Changes in monocyte subsets can predict the risk of AAA and are surrogate markers for AAA morphology in patients with late-stage disease

Bianca Hamann,Anna Klimova,Marvin Kapalla,David M. Poitz,Frieda Frank,Henning Morawietz,Christian Reeps,Anja Hofmann
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.11.18.24317518
2024-11-19
Abstract:Background Monocytes play a pivotal role in pathology of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) and can display an immunophenotypic heterogeneity with functionally distinct subpopulations. Alterations in monocyte subsets have been described in CVD, and some are associated with cardiovascular risk, but their profile in AAA is poorly understood. Aim We aimed to comprehensively define associations of circulating monocyte phenotypes with AAA risk and AAA morphology. Methods Monocyte subsets (CD14++CD16−, CD14++/CD16+, CD14+/CD16++) were analyzed in a prospective, observational study in patients with AAA (n=34) and varicose veins (n=34) by using flow cytometry. Results Classical monocytes were 1.6-fold lower (P=0.001) in AAA, while intermediate and non-classical monocytes were 1.8 (P=0.019) and 1.9-fold (P=0.025) higher in AAA, respectively. The differences remained significant after adjusting for age, sex and peripheral artery disease. A lower proportion of classical monocytes (HR: 0.73, P=0.002) and increases in intermediate (HR: 1.41, P=0.006) and non-classical monocytes (HR: 1.54, P=0.030) were associated with a higher risk of AAA. Non-classical monocytes showed an inverse correlation with AAA diameter (Pearson correlation =-0.64, P=0.001) and AAA volume (Pearson correlation =-0.50, P=0.003). Conclusion The present study revealed age- and sex-independent shifts in monocytes, all of which were associated with risk of AAA disease. Non-classical monocytes were inversely correlated with AAA diameter and volume and thus may be surrogate markers for AAA morphology.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?