Appraised evidence and decision making in clinical practice.

Chrysi Leliopoulou,Theodora Stroumpouki,Emmanouil Stafylarakis,Linda Collins

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.11.15.24317373

2024-11-15

Abstract:Abstract Background: The use of evidence in decision making in clinical practice may vary significantly from practice to practice. Research suggests that clinicians may ignore research-based evidence in their practice or use research evidence indirectly. The aim of this systematic review is to explore using an online independent learning approach for clinicians making evidence-based decisions using research and evidence. Methodology: This systematic literature review was conducted across MEDLINE, PUBMED, SCIENCE Direct, APA PSYCINFO and CINHAL databases. The use of a search strategy employed to conduct searches on the individual database. Using the MMAT criteria by Hong et al., 2018) studies were screened and reviewed. Results: The findings from each study were thematically analysed and organised in the following thematic areas: (1) Searching for an answer to the clinical question or problem; (2) Expanding on the evidence to address the clinical question or problem; (3) Recording the available evidence to the clinical problem; (4) Validating the evidence, whether research-based or tacit knowledge; (5) Inspecting the evidence for its potential to improve current practice; (6) Cascading the evidence appropriately and possibly adopting the evidence in the decision; and (7) Evaluating the outcome of the clinical decision. Conclusions: This systematic literature review found there is a lack of an online independent learning approach for clinicians making evidence-based decision using research and evidence which highlights a gap in the literature. Keywords: screening evidence, decision-making, clinical practice inquiry.

Health Systems and Quality Improvement