Immunogenicity and safety of DS-5670d, an mRNA-based COVID-19 vaccine targeting omicron XBB.1.5: Results from a phase 3, randomized, active-controlled study in adults and children aged ≥12 years

Fumihiko Takeshita,Ami Kawamoto,Masahiro Hashida,Katsuyasu Ishida,Kei Furihata,Aisaku Ota,Kaori Takahashi,Sachiko Sakakibara,Takashi Nakano
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.11.14.24317321
2024-11-15
Abstract:Background Many people worldwide have now acquired immune responses against the severe acute respiratory syndrome-coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) following previous vaccination and/or infection. As a result, national vaccination programs are now implementing a simplified schedule of single-dose administration and seasonal boosters. In this phase 3 non-inferiority study, we assessed the immunogenicity and safety of a single dose of the lipid nanoparticle-messenger ribonucleic acid vaccine DS-5670d, a monovalent composition for the 2023/24 season, containing an omicron XBB.1.5-derived antigen. Methods and Findings Adults and children aged ≥12 years were stratified according to their history of both prior SARS-CoV-2 infection plus prior coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccination (subpopulation A), prior infection only (subpopulation B), prior vaccination only (subpopulation C), or no history of either infection or vaccination (subpopulation D), and randomly assigned (1:1) to receive DS-5670d or monovalent BNT162b2 omicron XBB.1.5. In the combined ABC subpopulations (DS-5670d, n = 362 vs BNT162b2, n = 363), the adjusted geometric mean titer ratio of blood neutralizing activity against SARS-CoV-2 (omicron XBB.1.5) was 1.218 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.059, 1.401) and the seroresponse rates were 87.3% (DS-5670d) and 82.9% (BNT162b2) with an adjusted difference of 4.5% (95% CI, –0.70, 9.71). Both results exceeded prespecified non-inferiority margins and the study met the primary endpoint. Immunogenicity data in the overall ABCD population also met non-inferiority criteria. There were no apparent differences in immunogenicity according to age or sex, and analyses suggested that even unvaccinated persons achieved an adequate immune response following a single dose of DS-5670d. There were no major differences in the incidence or severity of adverse events between the study vaccination groups. Conclusions A single dose of DS-5670d was immunogenically non-inferior to BNT162b2 and acceptably safe in persons with or without a history of prior infection and/or vaccination. Trial Registration Japan Registry of Clinical Trials (jRCT2031230424)
Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS)
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
This paper aims to evaluate the immunogenicity and safety of DS - 5670d (an mRNA COVID - 19 vaccine against the omicron XBB.1.5 variant) in adults and children aged 12 and above, and compare it with another monovalent vaccine, BNT162b2 (also against the omicron XBB.1.5 variant). The main objective of the study is to verify whether DS - 5670d is non - inferior to BNT162b2 in terms of immunogenicity and to evaluate its safety. ### Research Background - **Global Epidemic Situation**: Although COVID - 19 caused by SARS - CoV - 2 is no longer regarded as a global emergency, it still remains a continuous threat to public health. New escape variants keep emerging, and combined with the weakening of protective immunity over time, it becomes necessary to develop, test, and authorize updated vaccine combinations. - **Vaccine Strategy Shift**: The current vaccination programs have shifted from emergency use to seasonal vaccination to enhance the protective immune response against emerging variants. In addition, a single - dose regimen is now recommended for most recipients as the primary or booster vaccination. ### Research Design - **Participants**: The study included adults and children aged 12 and above from 15 Japanese sites. - **Grouping**: Participants were divided into four subgroups according to their previous infection and/or vaccination history: - **A**: With a history of previous SARS - CoV - 2 infection and COVID - 19 vaccination. - **B**: Only with a history of previous SARS - CoV - 2 infection. - **C**: Only with a history of previous COVID - 19 vaccination. - **D**: Without any history of SARS - CoV - 2 infection or vaccination. - **Random Allocation**: Members of each subgroup were randomly allocated in a 1:1 ratio to receive DS - 5670d (60 µg mRNA) or BNT162b2 (30 µg mRNA). ### Main Results - **Immunogenicity**: - **Primary Analysis (ABC Subgroups)**: The adjusted geometric mean titer (GMT) in the DS - 5670d group was 1691.877 (95% CI: 1527.122, 1874.405), and in the BNT162b2 group was 1388.927 (95% CI: 1253.021, 1539.573). The adjusted GMT ratio was 1.218 (95% CI: 1.059, 1.401), which exceeded the preset non - inferiority criteria. - **Seroconversion Rate**: It was 87.3% (95% CI: 83.42, 90.54) in the DS - 5670d group and 82.9% (95% CI: 78.65, 86.65) in the BNT162b2 group. The adjusted difference was 4.5% (95% CI: –0.70, 9.71), which also exceeded the preset non - inferiority criteria. - **Secondary Analysis (ABCD Subgroups)**: The results also showed that DS - 5670d was non - inferior to BNT162b2 in terms of immunogenicity. ### Safety - **Adverse Events**: There were no significant differences in the incidence and severity of adverse events between the two groups, and no serious adverse events related to DS - 5670d were found. ### Conclusions - **Immunogenicity**: A single dose of DS - 5670d is non - inferior to BNT162b2 in terms of immunogenicity, regardless of whether the subjects have a previous infection and/or vaccination history. - **Safety**: DS - 5670d has good safety, and there are no new major safety issues, indicating that it can be an effective vaccine option for SARS - CoV - 2. Through these results, the study has proven the effectiveness of DS - 5670d in terms of immunogenicity and safety, supporting its use as a booster vaccine in the 2023/24 season.