Treatment decision algorithms for tuberculosis screening and diagnosis in children below 5 years hospitalised with severe acute malnutrition: a cost-effectiveness analysis

Marc d'Elbée,Nyashadzaishe Mafirakureva,Chishala Chabala,Minh Huyen Ton Nu Nguyet,Martin Harker,Clémentine Roucher,Gerald Businge,Perfect Shankalala,Bwendo Nduna,Veronica Mulenga,Maryline Bonnet,Eric Wobudeya,Olivier Marcy,Peter James Dodd
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.11.12.24317217
2024-11-13
Abstract:Background: Children with severe acute malnutrition (SAM) face higher risks of underdiagnosis and death from tuberculosis. In 2022, the World Health Organization (WHO) recommended use of treatment decision algorithms (TDAs) for tuberculosis diagnosis in children. There is currently no cost-effectiveness evidence for TDA-based approaches compared to routine practice. Methods: The TB-Speed SAM study developed i) a one-step TDA including Xpert, clinical, radiological and echography features, and ii) a two-step TDA, which also included a screening phase, for children under 5 years hospitalised with SAM at tertiary hospitals in Uganda and Zambia. We assessed the diagnostic accuracy and cost-effectiveness of deploying TB-Speed and WHO TDA-based approaches compared to the standard of care (SOC). Estimated outcomes included children started on tuberculosis treatment, false positive rates, disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs). Findings: Per 100 children hospitalised with SAM, averaging 19 children with tuberculosis, the one-step TDA initiated 17 true positive children (95% uncertainty intervals [UI]: 12-23) on tuberculosis treatment, the WHO TDA 16 (95%UI: 13-21), the two-step TDA 16 (95%UI: 10-23), and SOC 4 (95%UI: 1-9). The WHO TDA generated the most false positives (50%, 95%UI: 44-57), followed by the one-step TDA (22%, 95%UI: 17-27), the two-step TDA (17%, 95%UI: 12-22), and SOC (13%, 95%UI: 9-17). All TDA-based approaches had ICERs below plausible country cost-effectiveness thresholds compared to SOC (one-step: $44-51/DALY, two-step: $34-39/DALY, WHO: $43-49/DALY). Interpretation: Our findings show that these TDA-based approaches are highly cost-effective for the vulnerable group of children hospitalised with SAM, compared to current practice.
Health Economics
What problem does this paper attempt to address?