Sample size estimates for biomarker-based outcome measures in clinical trials in autosomal dominant Alzheimer's disease

David M Cash,Katy E Morgan,Antoinette O'Connor,Thomas D Veale,Ian B Malone,Teresa Poole,Tammie LS Benzinger,Brian A Gordon,Laura M Ibanez,Yan Li,Jorge J Llibre-Guerra,Eric McDade,Guoqiao Wang,Jasmeer P Chhatwal,Gregory Day,Edward Huey,Mathias Jucker,Johannes Levin,Yoshiki Niimi,James M Noble,Jee Hoon Roh,Raquel Sanchez-Valle,Peter Schofield,Randall J Bateman,Chris Frost,Nick C Fox,The Dominantly Inherited Alzheimer Network
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.11.12.24316919
2024-11-13
Abstract:INTRODUCTION: Alzheimer disease (AD)-modifying therapies are approved for treatment of early-symptomatic AD. Autosomal dominant AD (ADAD) provides a unique opportunity to test therapies in presymptomatic individuals. METHODS: Using data from the Dominantly Inherited Alzheimer Network (DIAN), sample sizes for clinical trials were estimated for various cognitive, imaging, and CSF outcomes. RESULTS: Biomarkers measuring amyloid and tau pathology had required sample sizes below 200 participants per arm (examples CSF Aβ42/40: 22[95%CI 13,46], cortical PIB 32[20,57], CSF p-tau181 58[40,112]) for a four-year trial to have 80% power (5% statistical significance) to detect a 25% reduction in absolute levels of pathology, allowing 40% dropout. For cognitive, MRI, and FDG, it was more appropriate to detect a 50% reduction in rate of change. Sample sizes ranged from 75-250 (examples precuneus volume: 137[80,284], cortical FDG: 256[100,1208], CDR-SB: 161[102,291]). DISCUSSION: Despite the rarity of ADAD, clinical trials with feasible sample sizes given the number of cases appear possible.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?