Abstract:Abstract Genetic interactions, a phenomenon whereby combinations of mutations lead to unexpected effects, reflect how cellular processes are wired and play an important role in complex genetic diseases. Understanding the molecular basis of genetic interactions is crucial for deciphering pathway organization as well as understanding the relationship between genetic variation and disease. Several putative molecular mechanisms have been linked to different genetic interaction types. However, differences in genetic interaction patterns and their underlying mechanisms have not yet been compared systematically between different functional gene classes. Here, differences in the occurrence and types of genetic interactions are compared for two classes, gene-specific transcription factors (GSTFs) and signaling genes (kinases and phosphatases). Genome-wide gene expression data for 63 single and double deletion mutants in baker’s yeast reveals that the two most common genetic interaction patterns are buffering and inversion. Buffering is typically associated with redundancy and is well understood. In inversion, genes show opposite behavior in the double mutant compared to the corresponding single mutants. The underlying mechanism is poorly understood. Although both classes show buffering and inversion patterns, the prevalence of inversion is much stronger in GSTFs. To decipher potential mechanisms, a Petri Net modeling approach was employed, where genes are represented as nodes and relationships between genes as edges. This allowed over 9 million possible three and four node models to be exhaustively enumerated. The models show that a quantitative difference in interaction strength is a strict requirement for obtaining inversion. In addition, this difference is frequently accompanied with a second gene that shows buffering. Taken together, these results provide a mechanistic explanation for inversion. Furthermore, the ability of transcription factors to differentially regulate expression of their targets provides a likely explanation why inversion is more prevalent for GSTFs compared to kinases and phosphatases. Author Summary The relationship between genotype and phenotype is one of the major challenges in biology. While many previous studies have identified genes involved in complex genetic diseases, there is still a gap between genotype and phenotype. One of the difficulties in filling this gap has been attributed to genetic interactions. Large-scale studies have revealed that genetic interactions are widespread in model organisms such as baker’s yeast. Several molecular mechanisms have been proposed for different genetic interaction types. However, differences in occurrence and underlying molecular mechanism of genetic interactions have not yet been compared between gene classes of different function. Here, we compared genetic interaction patterns identified using gene expression profiling for two classes of genes: gene specific transcription factors and signaling related genes. We modelled all possible molecular networks to unravel putative molecular differences underlying different genetic interaction patterns. Our study proposes a new mechanistic explanation for a certain genetic interaction pattern that is more strongly associated with transcription factors compared to signaling related genes. Overall, our findings and the computational methodologies implemented here can be valuable for understanding the molecular mechanisms underlying genetic interactions.

Protein-protein interaction is a major source of epistasis in genetic interaction networks

Bacterial protein interaction networks: connectivity is ruled by gene conservation, essentiality and function

Simulated evolution of protein-protein interaction networks with realistic topology

Protein-protein interaction networks as miners of biological discovery

Pathway redundancy and protein essentiality revealed in the Saccharomyces cerevisiae interaction networks

Comparison of protein interaction networks reveals species conservation and divergence

Interdependent Patterns in Protein-Protein Interaction Networks.

An Inter-Species Protein-Protein Interaction Network Across Vast Evolutionary Distance

Coevolution is A Short-Distance Force at the Protein Interaction Level and Correlates with the Modular Organization of Protein Networks

Distinct Network Patterns Emerge from Cartesian and XOR Epistasis Models: A Comparative Network Science Analysis

Pitfalls of machine learning models for protein–protein interaction networks

Can Simple Codon Pair Usage Predict Protein-Protein Interaction?

The ability of transcription factors to differentially regulate gene expression is a crucial component of the mechanism underlying inversion, a frequently observed genetic interaction pattern

Importance of higher-order epistasis in large protein sequence-function relationships

Higher-order epistasis and phenotypic prediction

Cryptic genetic variation shapes the fate of gene duplicates in a protein interaction network

Protein interaction networks and biology: towards the connection

Identifying influential genes in protein-protein interaction networks.

Identification of Protein–Protein Interaction Associated Functions Based on Gene Ontology

Assessing The Limits Of Genomic Data Integration For Predicting Protein Networks

Protein Interaction Prediction By Integrating Genomic Features And Protein Interaction Network Analysis