Abstract:Introduction Wearable accelerometers are a valuable tool for monitoring sleep, sedentary behaviour, and physical activity patterns within 24h time-use in free-living environments. While wrist-worn accelerometers are favoured for monitoring sleep, they do not accurately distinguish between sitting and lying positions (Narayanan et al., 2020). This study aims to determine whether back or thigh-mounted accelerometers yield sleep metrics comparable to wrist-worn devices using an open-source algorithm originally validated for the wrist. Methods Data from 20 healthy sleepers were collected using Axivity AX3 accelerometers. Participants wore accelerometers on their right thigh, low back, and wrist for one night of sleep in their own bed. Sleep metrics were calculated using the van Hees algorithm through the GGIR package in R. The primary outcomes were: Total Sleep Time (TST), Wake After Sleep Onset (WASO), Awakenings (AWK), Sleep Efficiency (SE), Sleep Interval (SI) and Sleep Onset Timestamp (SOT). Within subject ANOVA with Tukey's post hoc, Pearson correlation coefficients, Bland-Altman plots, and Cohen's d were used to assess the comparability of sleep metrics between the body placements. Results Data analysis included all 20 participants. Mid thigh accelerometers demonstrated a strong linear relationship with wrist accelerometers across all metrics (r = 0.86-0.98). Bland-Altman plots demonstrated a narrow 95% confidence interval suggesting that wrist and mid thigh metrics are in good agreement, except for AWK which is slightly underestimated by the mid thigh device. Conversely, low-back accelerometers demonstrated moderate linear relationship with the wrist (r = 0.63-0.98) and the Bland-Altman results showed wide limits of agreement with significant overestimations of TST, SE, SI and underestimations of WASO, AWK, SOT. Cohen's d demonstrated small differences between mid thigh and wrist devices, except for AWK (d= 0.42). Low back values for WASO, SE, and AWK showed moderate differences. Conclusions This analysis demonstrates that the mid-thigh accelerometer yields comparable sleep metrics to wrist-worn devices when processed with the van Hees algorithm.

A comparison of sleep metrics from mid-thigh and low-back accelerometers to wrist based data using open-source algorithms