Abstract:Objective: Because there is no reliable method on admission to predict whether a patient will require neurosurgical intervention in the future, the general approach remains to treat each patient with mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) and subdural hematoma (SDH) as if they will require such an intervention. Consequently, there is a growing population of patients with mTBI and SDH that is overtriaged despite having a low probability of needing neurosurgical intervention. This study aimed to train and validate a predictive rule-out tool for neurosurgical intervention in patients with mTBI and SDH. Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study of all trauma patients admitted to six level I trauma centers in three states. Patients were included if they met the following criteria: admitted between 2016 and 2020, ≥ 18 years of age, ICD-10 diagnosis of isolated SDH, initial head imaging available, initial Glasgow Coma Scale score of 13-15, and arrived within 48 hours of injury. Exclusion criteria included skull fracture, intracranial hemorrhage other than an SDH, and no neurosurgical consultation. Prediction variables included 34 demographic, clinical, and radiographic variables. The study outcome was neurosurgical intervention within 48 hours of hospital admission. Seventy-five percent of the data were used for training, and 25% for testing. Multivariable logistic regression with fivefold cross-validation was used on the training set to identify covariates with the highest specificity while holding sensitivity at 100%. Results were validated on the testing set. Results: In total, 1000 patients were in the training set and 333 in the testing set. The overall neurosurgical intervention rate was 8.8%. For the fivefold cross-validation process, three variables were selected that maximized specificity while holding sensitivity at 100%: maximum hematoma thickness, initial Glasgow Coma Scale score, and preinjury antithrombotic use (sensitivity 100%, specificity 56%, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve 0.94). With a cutoff probability of neurosurgical intervention set at 1.88%, the final model was validated to predict neurosurgical intervention with a sensitivity of 100% (95% CI 88.4%-100%) and specificity of 55.1% (95% CI 49.3%-60.8%). Conclusions: In this study, the largest of its kind to date, the authors successfully developed and validated a new tool for ruling out the necessity of neurosurgical intervention in patients with mTBI and isolated SDH. By successfully identifying more than half of patients who are unlikely to require neurosurgery within the first 2 days of admission, this tool can be used to improve treatment efficiency and provide patients and clinicians with valuable prognostic information.

Evaluation of a prioritization system for mild traumatic brain injury case ascertainment from emergency department records

Patient-centered mild traumatic brain injury interventions in the emergency department

Improving Head CT Scan Decisions for Pediatric Minor Head Trauma in General Emergency Departments: A Pragmatic Implementation Study

A supported primary health pathway for mild traumatic brain injury quality improvement report

Head Injury Evaluation and Ambulance Diagnosis (HOME) Study protocol: a feasibility study assessing the implementation of the Canadian CT Head Rule in the prehospital setting

Quality Improvement in Pediatric Head Trauma with PECARN Rules Implementation as Computerized Decision Support

Use of the Canadian CT head rule for patients on anticoagulant/anti-platelet therapy presenting with mild traumatic brain injury: prospective observational study

Development and validation of an electronic health record-based algorithm for identifying TBI in the VA: A VA Million Veteran Program study

Accuracy of Clinician Practice Compared With Three Head Injury Decision Rules in Children: A Prospective Cohort Study

Creating and validating a neurosurgical intervention rule-out tool for patients with mild traumatic brain injury and isolated subdural hematoma: a 5-year, six-center retrospective cohort study

The Risk of Deterioration in GCS13–15 Patients with Traumatic Brain Injury Identified by Computed Tomography Imaging: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Identifying prioritization criteria for patients with mtbi waiting for multidisciplinary rehabilitation services: A Delphi study

A review of traumatic brain injury trauma center visits meeting physiologic criteria from The American College of Surgeons Committee on Trauma/Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Field Triage Guidelines

The Cumulative Incidence of Post-Traumatic Epilepsy After Mild Traumatic Brain Injury: A Systematic Review and Individual Participant Data Meta-Analysis Protocol

Use of Traumatic Brain Injury Prediction Rules With Clinical Decision Support

Diagnostic Accuracy of Mental Health Screening Tools After Mild Traumatic Brain Injury

IMPACT recommendations for improving the design and analysis of clinical trials in moderate to severe traumatic brain injury

Emergency access to neurosurgical care for patients with traumatic brain injury

Time Thresholds for Using Pressure Reactivity Index in Neuroprognostication for Patients With Severe Traumatic Brain Injury

Impact of Triage Systems on Time to Diagnosis and Treatment of Traumatic Brain Injuries

Retrospective Validation of Brain Injury Guidelines in a Rural Level II Trauma Center