Abstract:Cancer cell clustering is a critical factor in metastasis, with cells often believed to migrate in groups as they establish themselves in new environments. This study presents preliminary findings from an in vitro experiment, suggesting that co-culturing cells provides an effective method for observing this phenomenon, even though the cells are grown as monolayers. We introduce a novel single-cell tracking approach based on graph theory to identify clusters in PC3 cells cultivated in both monoculture and co-culture with PC12 cells, using 66-hour time-lapse recordings. The initial step consists of defining linked pairs of PC3 cells, laying the foundation for the application of graph theory. We propose two alternative definitions for cell pairings. The first method, Method 1, defines cells as linked at a given time t if they are close together within a defined time period before and after t. A second potential alternative method, Method 2, pairs cells if there is an overlap between the convex hulls of their respective tracks during this time period. Pairing cells enables the application of graph theory for subsequent analysis. This framework represents a cell as a vertex (node) and a relation between two cells as an edge. An interconnected set of high-degree nodes (nodes with many connections or edges) forms a subgraph, or backbone, that defines a patch (cluster) of cells. All nodes connected to this backbone are part of the subgraph. The backbone of high-degree nodes functions as a partition (or cut) of the initial graph. Two consecutive clusters in the video are considered to share the same identity if the following cluster contains at least p = 75% of the cells from the preceding cluster, and the mean positions of their cells are within delta r = 75 um. PC3 cells grown in co-culture appear to form persistent clusters exceeding 10 cells after 40 to 50 hour incubation following seeding. In contrast, PC3 cells cultured alone (mono-culture) did not exhibit this behaviour. This approach is experimental and requires further validation with a broader dataset.

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

### What problems does this paper attempt to solve? This paper aims to explore the formation and behavioral characteristics of cancer cell aggregates (clusters) in in - vitro experiments. Specifically, the authors study the behavior of cell aggregates by video - tracking single cells, especially in the co - culture of the prostate cancer cell line PC3 and the nerve cell line PC12. The main objectives include: 1. **Understand the formation mechanism of cancer cell aggregates**: - Researchers hope to reveal how cancer cells interact with each other in groups and form aggregates. These aggregates are considered to play a key role in the cancer metastasis process. 2. **Evaluate the impact of different culture conditions on cell aggregates**: - By comparing the aggregate formation of PC3 cells under monoculture and co - culture conditions, researchers attempt to understand the influence of other cell types (such as PC12 cells) on the behavior of PC3 cells. 3. **Develop new single - cell tracking methods**: - The authors introduce a new method based on graph theory for identifying and analyzing cell aggregates. This method defines "linked" cell pairs and applies them to the graph theory framework to identify and characterize cell aggregates. 4. **Verify the hypothesis: Co - culture promotes the formation of cell aggregates**: - The experimental results show that under co - culture conditions, PC3 cells are more likely to form persistent aggregates, while this is not the case under monoculture conditions. This indicates that co - culture may promote the interaction between cells and the formation of aggregates. 5. **Provide potential therapeutic targets**: - By deeply understanding the formation mechanism of cancer cell aggregates, researchers hope to find new therapeutic targets, thereby inhibiting the progress and metastasis of cancer. ### Key Conclusions - Under co - culture conditions, PC3 cells begin to form stable aggregates after about 35 hours, and these aggregates persist within the 66 - hour recording time. - PC3 cells under monoculture conditions fail to exhibit similar aggregate - formation behavior. - Using two different methods (Method 1 and Method 2) for aggregate identification, the results show that co - culture conditions do promote aggregate formation, while aggregates under monoculture conditions are relatively short - lived and unstable. ### Formulas and Definitions - **Definition of Aggregates**: - Aggregates are defined as a group of cells that maintain spatial proximity and exhibit coordinated behavior over a period of time [Gopinathan and Gov, 2019]. - **Definition of Linked Cells (Method 1)**: - Two PC3 cells are defined as "linked" at time \( t \) if their distance is less than \( \Delta d=30\mu m \) within \( \Delta t = 2.5 \) hours before and after \( t \). - **Definition of Linked Cells (Method 2)**: - Two PC3 cells are defined as "linked" at time \( t \) if their convex hulls overlap during this time period. - **Definition of Aggregate Identity**: - If the aggregate \( C_2 \) at the subsequent image time \( t_2 \) contains at least 75% of the cells in the aggregate \( C_1 \) at the previous image time \( t_1 \), and the average position difference between the two does not exceed \( \Delta r = 75\mu m \), then these two aggregates are considered to have the same identity. \[ \frac{|C_1\cap C_2|}{|C_1|}\geq p\quad\text{where}\quad p = 0.75 \] Through these methods, researchers can gain a deeper understanding of the formation mechanism of cancer cell aggregates and their behavioral differences under different conditions.

Video tracking of single cells to identify clustering behaviour

Single Cell Analysis of Inertial Migration by Circulating Tumor Cells and Clusters

Better together: circulating tumor cell clustering in metastatic cancer

A Vicsek-type model of confined cancer cells with variable clustering affinities

Tracking Single-Cells in Overcrowded Bacterial Colonies

Quantitative Study of the Dynamic Tumor-Endothelial Cell Interactions Through an Integrated Microfluidic Coculture System.

High throughput, label-free isolation of circulating tumor cell clusters in meshed microwells

Cell tracking in microscopic video using matching and linking of bipartite graphs

Cell2Cell: Explorative Cell Interaction Analysis in Multi-Volumetric Tissue Data

Formation of motile cell clusters in heterogeneous model tumors: the role of cell-cell alignment

Tracking collective cell motion by topological data analysis

Algorithm to Identify Circulating Tumor Cell Clusters Using in Vivo Flow Cytometer

Detecting long-range interactions between migrating cells

Quantitative label-free single cell tracking in 3D biomimetic matrices

A novel approach for the quantification of single-cell adhesion dynamics from microscopy images

Computational identification of surface markers for isolating distinct subpopulations from heterogeneous cancer cell populations

Cell tracking for live-cell microscopy using an activity-prioritized assignment strategy

Microfluidic Systems for Studying Cell Migration Regulation

Comparing instance segmentation methods for analyzing clonal growth of single cells in microfluidic chips

Diagnostic microchip to assay 3D colony-growth potential of captured circulating tumor cells

Simultaneous 2D and 3D cell culture array for multicellular geometry, drug discovery and tumor microenvironment reconstruction