Evaluating the Survival and Removal of from Surfaces Made with Traditional and Sustainable Cement-Based Materials in Field-Relevant Conditions

Claire E. Anderson,Jason Hernandez,Suhi Hanif,Lauren Owens,Yoshika Crider,Sarah L. Billington,Michael Lepech,Alexandria B Boehm,Jade Benjamin-Chung
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.11.07.622504
2024-11-08
Abstract:Soil household floors are common in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) and can serve as reservoirs of enteric pathogens. Cement-based floors may interrupt pathogen transmission, but little is known about pathogen survival or removal from cement-based surfaces. This study investigated the survival of Escherichia coli ( ), an indicator of fecal contamination, on cement-based surfaces and evaluated its reduction through common household activities (mopping, sweeping, and walking). We compared fate on three mixes: 1) Ordinary Portland Cement (OPC) concrete (used in the United States), 2) OPC mortar (used in Bangladesh), and 3) OPC mortar with fly ash (a sustainable alternative to the Bangladesh mix). Additionally, we compared outcomes on cement-based surfaces with and without soil and at two temperatures representing the dry and wet seasons in Bangladesh. After 4 hours on the cement-based surfaces, decayed more than 1.1 log10 (C/C0)) under all conditions tested, which is significantly faster than in bulk soils. The higher temperature increased the decay rate constant (p = 5.56*10 ) while soil presence decreased it (p = 2.80*10 ). Sweeping and mopping resulted in high levels of removal for all mixes, with a mean removal of 71% and 78%, respectively, versus 22% for walking. The concrete and mortar mix designs did not impact survival or removal (p > 0.20). Cement-based floors made with a fly ash mix performed similarly to traditional cement-based floors, supporting its potential use as a more sustainable intervention to reduce fecal contamination in rural LMIC household settings.
Microbiology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?