Abstract:We profiled the full substrate specificity of Pro‐Pro endopeptidases (PPEPs) in detail using a combination of synthetic combinatorial peptides and mass spectrometry. With this method, we determined the specificity of previously characterized PPEPs, PPEP mutants, and novel (putative) PPEPs. By combining this data with structural information, we shed more light on the structure–function relationship of this group of proteases. Adapted from Claushuis B et al. (2023 Anal Chem 95, 11621–11631), which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. A group of bacterial proteases, the Pro‐Pro endopeptidases (PPEPs), possess the unique ability to hydrolyze proline‐proline bonds in proteins. Since a protease's function is largely determined by its substrate specificity, methods that can extensively characterize substrate specificity are valuable tools for protease research. Previously, we achieved an in‐depth characterization of PPEP prime‐side specificity. However, PPEP specificity is also determined by the non‐prime‐side residues in the substrate. To gain a more complete insight into the determinants of PPEP specificity, we characterized the non‐prime‐ and prime‐side specificity of various PPEPs using a combination of synthetic combinatorial peptide libraries and mass spectrometry. With this approach, we deepened our understanding of the P3‐P3′ specificities of PPEP‐1 and PPEP‐2, while identifying the endogenous substrate of PPEP‐2 as the most optimal substrate in our library data. Furthermore, by employing the library approach, we investigated the altered specificity of mutants of PPEP‐1 and PPEP‐2. Additionally, we characterized a novel PPEP from Anoxybacillus tepidamans, which we termed PPEP‐4. Based on structural comparisons, we hypothesized that PPEP‐4 displays a PPEP‐1‐like prime‐side specificity, which was substantiated by the experimental data. Intriguingly, another putative PPEP from Clostridioides difficile, CD1597, did not display Pro‐Pro endoproteolytic activity. Collectively, we characterized PPEP specificity in detail using our robust peptide library method and, together with additional structural information, provide more insight into the intricate mechanisms that govern protease specificity.

Comprehensive protease specificity profiling

Non-prime- and Prime-side Profiling of Pro-Pro Endopeptidase Specificity Using Synthetic Combinatorial Peptide Libraries and Mass Spectrometry

Non‐prime‐ and prime‐side profiling of Pro‐Pro endopeptidase specificity using synthetic combinatorial peptide libraries and mass spectrometry

Procleave: Predicting Protease-specific Substrate Cleavage Sites by Combining Sequence and Structural Information

Revealing Favorable and Unfavorable Residues in Cooperative Positions in Protease Cleavage Sites.

Accelerating Proteomics Using Broad Specificity Proteases

Identification of Phosphopeptides with Unknown Cleavage Specificity by a De Novo Sequencing Assisted Database Search Strategy.

Twenty Years of Bioinformatics Research for Protease-Specific Substrate and Cleavage Site Prediction: a Comprehensive Revisit and Benchmarking of Existing Methods.

HIV‐1 Protease Cleavage Site Prediction Based on Amino Acid Property

iProt-Sub: a comprehensive package for accurately mapping and predicting protease-specific substrates and cleavage sites.

PROSPERous: high-throughput prediction of substrate cleavage sites for 90 proteases with improved accuracy.

Bioinformatic approaches for predicting substrates of proteases.

Identification of Proteases and Their Types

DNA‐Encoded Noncanonical Substrate Library for Protease Profiling

Deep quantification of substrate turnover defines protease subsite cooperativity

Proteomic data and structure analysis combined reveal interplay of structural rigidity and flexibility on selectivity of cysteine cathepsins

A high-throughput, multiplexed assay for superfamily-wide profiling of enzyme activity

The utility of proteases in proteomics, from sequence profiling to structure and function analysis

Quantitative and Comparative Profiling of Protease Substrates Through a Genetically Encoded Multifunctional Photocrosslinker

Global Profiling Of Protease Cleavage Sites By Chemoselective Labeling Of Protein N-Termini

PROFICS: A bacterial selection system for directed evolution of proteases