Stage-specific gene ratios highlight genes and mechanisms related to presymptomatic and symptomatic Multiple Myeloma

Grigoris Georgiou,George Minadakis,Nestoras Karathanasis,Kyriaki Savva,Efi Athieniti,Marilena M Bourdakou,George M Spyrou
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.11.04.621824
2024-11-06
Abstract:Background/aim: Multiple Myeloma is the second most common blood cancer, characterised by the accumulation of malignant plasma cells and the production of large amounts of a monoclonal immunoglobulin protein, in the bone marrow. The identification and progression/behaviour of molecular markers across stages remains a scientific challenge. This work aims to provide a holistic approach to the understanding of the disease progression, providing specific methodologies and candidate biomarkers, able to characterise and distinguish the disease state across stages. Materials and methods: Two large bulk RNA datasets were used to collect and integrate stage-specific information at the gene level by means of: (a) differential expression analysis to obtain differential expressed genes (DEGs), (b) a recently introduced computational methodology able to detect monotonically expressed genes (MEGs), (c) a proposed computational methodology that uses pairs of MEGs at sample level, to classify and discriminate different stages of Multiple Myeloma. Additional numerical metrics were applied to rank the performance of these pairs across samples, facilitating the characterization and differentiation of disease stages. Validation was conducted using five additional external datasets, which were then utilised to enrich the final selection of top-rated genes identified from the two bulk RNA datasets under study. The final top-ranked genes were further used for pathway enrichment analysis in order to provide candidate pathways per stage. Results: We first show that MEGs provide better statistics than DEGs, both at gene and pathway level analysis. Secondly, we show that the proposed computational methodology by means of MEGs reveals short lists of high discriminative genes across stages, which in turn highlight significant groups of pathways. Conclusion: We integrated traditional analysis of DEGs with a recently introduced methodology for identifying MEGs, creating a novel computational approach capable of identifying highly discriminative genes and pathways that can serve as candidate markers for stage identification in a single sample.
Bioinformatics
What problem does this paper attempt to address?