Abstract:Visual interneurons come in many different flavors, representing luminance changes at one location as ON or OFF signals with different dynamics, ranging from purely sustained to sharply transient responses. While the functional relevance of this representation for subsequent computations like direction-selective motion detection is well understood, the mechanisms by which these differences in dynamics arise are unclear. Here, I study this question in the fly optic lobe. Taking advantage of the known connectome I simulate a network of five adjacent optical columns each comprising 65 different cell types. Each neuron is modeled as an electrically compact single compartment, conductance-based element that receives input from other neurons within its column and from its neighboring columns according to the intra- and inter-columnar connectivity matrix. The sign of the input is determined according to the known transmitter type of the presynaptic neuron and the receptor on the postsynaptic side. In addition, some of the neurons are given voltage-dependent conductances known from the fly transcriptome. As free parameters, each neuron has an input and an output gain, applied to all its input and output synapses, respectively. The parameters are adjusted such that the spatio-temporal receptive field properties of 13 out of the 65 simulated neurons match the experimentally determined ones as closely as possible. Despite the fact that all neurons have identical leak conductance and membrane capacitance, this procedure leads to a surprisingly good fit to the data, where specific neurons respond transiently while others respond in a sustained way to luminance changes. This fit critically depends on the presence of an H-current in some of the first-order interneurons, i.e., lamina cells L1 and L2: turning off the H-current eliminates the transient response nature of many neurons leaving only sustained responses in all of the examined interneurons. I conclude that the diverse dynamic response behavior of the columnar neurons in the fly optic lobe starts in the lamina and is created by their different intrinsic membrane properties. I predict that eliminating the hyperpolarization-activated current by RNAi should strongly affect the dynamics of many medulla neurons and, consequently, also higher-order functions depending on them like direction-selectivity in T4 and T5 neurons.

From the fly connectome to exact ring attractor dynamics

A neural circuit architecture for angular integration in Drosophila

The fly connectome reveals a path to the effectome

A computational model of the integration of landmarks and motion in the insect central complex

From connectome to effectome: learning the causal interaction map of the fly brain

Connectome-constrained networks predict neural activity across the fly visual system

Converting an allocentric goal into an egocentric steering signal

Neural dynamics and architecture of the heading direction circuit in zebrafish

A neural circuit architecture for rapid behavioral flexibility in goal-directed navigation

Continuous integration of heading and goal directions guides steering

A Multi-regional Network Encoding Heading and Steering Maneuvers in Drosophila

Flight-induced compass representation in the monarch butterfly heading network

Recurrent connections enable point attractor dynamics and dimensionality reduction in a connectome-constrained model of the insect learning center

Estimating orientation in Natural scenes: A Spiking Neural Network Model of the Insect Central Complex

Theoretical principles explain the structure of the insect head direction circuit

Synaptic ring attractor: A unified framework for attractor dynamics and multiple cues integration

Bilateral interactions of optic-flow sensitive neurons coordinate course control in flies

A neural circuit for navigation keeps flies on target

Cellular Connectomes As Arbiters of Local Circuit Models in the Cerebral Cortex.

Differential temporal filtering in the fly optic lobe