Family screening for hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: initial cardiologic assessment, and long-term follow-up of genotype-positive phenotype-negative individuals

Stephan Arend Cornelis Schoonvelde,Georgios M Alexandridis,Laura B Price,Arend Schinkel,Alexander Hirsch,Peter-Paul Zwetsloot,Janneke A.E. Kammeraad,Marjon van Slegtenhorst,Judith M.A. Verhagen,Rudolf A. De Boer,Michelle Michels
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.11.01.24316619
2024-11-04
Abstract:Aims: (i) Investigate the prevalence of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) in individuals with pathogenic/likely pathogenic (P/LP) gene variants detected through family cascade testing in relatives, and (ii) evaluate phenotypic progression in genotype-positive phenotype-negative (G+/P-) individuals during follow-up. Results: From 2000-2023, 273 individuals underwent cardiologic evaluation following P/LP variant detection through family screening. Upon initial evaluation, HCM was diagnosed in 128 (47%) individuals. Comparing with 145 G+/P- individuals, HCM patients were older (48 vs 38 years, p<0.001) and more likely male (57% vs 34%, p<0.001). During follow-up (median 11 years), 14 (11%) of the HCM patients died (two from sudden cardiac death), four (3%) underwent myectomy, 15 (12%) developed atrial fibrillation and 17 (13%) required implantable cardioverter-defibrillator implantation (15 primary prevention, 88%). HCM-related adverse outcomes correlated with younger diagnosis age. During follow-up (median 8 years), out of the 118 G+/P- subjects, seven (6%) individuals (71% female, diagnosed age 39-77, after median follow-up 6 years) developed HCM (mean maximal wall thickness increasing from 10.2 mm to 13.3 mm). In this G+/P- cohort, significant echocardiographic changes from baseline to last visit were negligible. Over half (56%) had <1 mm change of maximal wall thickness. No adverse cardiac outcomes occurred. Conclusion: The initial evaluation was high-yield, with HCM being diagnosed in 47% of G+ individuals, more frequently in older males. Over a median 8-year follow-up, 6% of G+/P- individuals developed mild HCM, with no adverse cardiac outcomes. These data support initial screening in all first degree relatives, but (very) low-frequency cardiologic evaluations for G+/P- individuals thereafter.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?