The Impact of Clinical Audits on Improving the Effectiveness of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM) CARE in Primary Health Centers. A Comprehensive Pre-post analysis through Multi-layered Intervention : The ICAE-DM CARE study protocol.

Ansif Pallath Majeed,Niyaz Panakaje,Shajitha Thekke Veettil,Kiran Harikumar,Hanan Al Mujalli,Abdul Ali Shah,Noora Jassim AlKubaisi,Ahmed Sameer Alnuaimi
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.10.30.24316448
2024-11-01
Abstract:Background Conducting clinical reviews is integral to the continuous process of enhancing healthcare quality by identifying specific areas or aspects within medical services and clinical practices. These reviews involve measuring a clinical outcome or process against established evidence-based standards, aiming to spotlight discrepancies between current practice and these benchmarks to facilitate improvements in care quality. Notably, clinical reviews rely on the exceptional skill of the driving force, underscored by key elements: the clinical expertise of participants, result confidentiality, and an objective strongly linked to the professional 'quality’.   The worldwide prevalence of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is on the rise, especially in economically developing nations.  Current research conducted in Qatar indicates a significant prevalence of diabetes mellitus within the adult population, alongside a considerable proportion of pre-diabetes cases that are likely to elevate the incidence of diabetes mellitus in the coming years. This information underscores the critical need for effective diabetes management at the primary care level, particularly for individuals with pre-diabetes. A comprehensive systematic assessment and intervention are essential to enhance diabetes care.   Methods   The proposed research will adopt a quasi-experimental design, which includes a baseline cross-sectional situational analysis conducted across 31 Primary Health Care Centers (PHCCs) prior to the intervention. The study will focus on patients aged 18 and older who have been diagnosed with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM), encompassing both newly diagnosed individuals and those in follow-up care, while excluding pregnant patients. A random sampling method will be utilized to ensure a representative sample size of 450 patients from the last three months of diabetes consultations. Following the identification of gaps in the situational analysis, an intervention will be implemented, after which a post-intervention cross-sectional study will be carried out using the same sample as the baseline to evaluate changes in the measured parameters. Additionally, a cohort study will be performed through a telephonic survey of a random sample of 60 patients, both before and after the intervention, to assess changes from the patients' perspective.   Discussion   A comprehensive assessment and intervention are essential to evaluate the quality of diabetes care delivered at primary health centers. The ICAE-DM CARE study aims to provide an effective situational analysis, which will include the identification of gaps and the underlying causes of these gaps in the DM care using suitable quality improvement tools. The study will also showcase appropriate intervention strategies to improve practice. Furthermore, the implications of this process will be thoroughly examined. This study design will closely reflect a practical understanding of healthcare quality management in diabetes care, which can be applied in similar settings.
Health Systems and Quality Improvement
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The main problem that this paper attempts to solve is to evaluate the effectiveness of clinical audits in improving the management of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) in primary care centers. Specifically, the research aims to: 1. **Identify deficiencies in current diabetes management**: Through baseline cross - sectional analysis, identify problems and gaps in diabetes management in 31 primary care centers. 2. **Implement intervention measures**: Based on the identified problems, develop and implement improvement measures to enhance the quality of diabetes management and related documentation. 3. **Evaluate the effect of intervention**: Through subsequent cross - sectional studies and patient surveys, evaluate the impact of intervention measures on the quality of diabetes management, including improvements in clinical practice, patient satisfaction, etc. ### Research background With the increasing global incidence of type 2 diabetes, especially in less - economically - developed countries, effective diabetes management has become particularly important. Studies in Qatar have shown that the prevalence of diabetes among adults is high, and there are a large number of people in the pre - diabetes state, which may increase the incidence of diabetes in the future. Therefore, there is an urgent need for systematic evaluation and intervention at the primary care level to improve diabetes management. ### Research methods This study adopts a quasi - experimental design and is divided into the following stages: 1. **Baseline assessment**: Conduct cross - sectional analysis in 31 primary care centers and collect medical record data of 450 patients aged 18 and above diagnosed with type 2 diabetes. 2. **Intervention implementation**: Based on the results of the baseline assessment, develop and implement targeted intervention measures. 3. **Subsequent assessment**: After the implementation of the intervention, conduct cross - sectional studies again and use the same sample to evaluate changes. 4. **Patient survey**: Conduct telephone surveys of 60 randomly selected patients to evaluate their satisfaction with diabetes management. ### Research objectives - **Determine the effectiveness of clinical audits**: Evaluate whether clinical audits can effectively improve the management of type 2 diabetes and the quality of related documentation. - **Improve patient satisfaction**: By improving diabetes management, increase patient satisfaction with medical services. - **Provide generalizable experiences**: Provide quality improvement experiences for other primary care institutions to promote the standardization and normalization of diabetes management. In short, through systematic clinical audits and intervention measures, this study aims to improve the diabetes management level in primary care centers and provide references for similar institutions.